The study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the AES Ultra CPVTM or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.
Recent evidence suggests that reduction of LMA intracuff pressure may decrease the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms. Yet, pressure manometers are not widely available limiting the application of a strategy of intracuff pressure reduction. The Ultra airway has been designed to provide continuous indication of intracuff pressure and can limit the intracuff pressure to \< 60 cm H2O. This study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the Ultra or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
170
Univeristy Health Network- Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The primary outcome, composite pharyngolaryngeal complication, is defined as the presence of either sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia at 1, 2, and 24 h postoperatively.
Time frame: 1, 2, 24 hours
Intracuff pressure
Intracuff pressure intraoperative 10 post insertion
Time frame: intraoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.