The purpose of this clinical investigation is to further assess the performance and safety profile of the commercially-available Portico™ TAVI System in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
This is an international multicenter, prospective, non-randomized clinical investigation without concurrent or matched control, designed to assess the mid-term safety and performance of the Portico valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis whom are high risk for surgical valve replacement. The primary endpoint is 1 year all-cause mortality. In addition, the performance and safety profile of the Portico valve will be further evaluated at 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years post-implant. The investigation will be conducted at approximately 65 centers in approximately 15 countries in Europe, Middle-East, Africa, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,032
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 1 year post implantation
Time frame: 1 year post implant
Percentage of Participants With All Cause Mortality in Cohort A
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (30 Days, Annually From 1 Year Through 5 Years) in Cohort B
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants that died for cardiovascular or unknown reasons as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, Australia
St Andrews Hospital
Adelaide, Australia
Heart Care Partners-Wesley Hospital
Auchenflower, Australia
The Prince Charles Hospital
Chermside, Australia
Royal North Shore hospital
Leonards Hill, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Australia
Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus
Parkville, Australia
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Perth, Australia
North Shore Private Hospital
St Leonards, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Australia
...and 50 more locations
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Vascular Access Site Complication as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with vascular access site complication (major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Percentage of Participants With Bleeding Events as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a bleeding events (life threatening, major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stage 1, 2 and 3 Acute Kidney Injury as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a Stage 1, 2 or Stage 3 acute kidney injury as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Aortic Valve Area)
The aortic valve area as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Mean Transvalvular Gradient)
The mean transvalvular gradient as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 1 year post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Mean Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Distance in metres that the participant can walk in 6 minutes. The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a commonly used objective measure of functional exercise capacity in individuals with moderately severe impairment.
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implant
Mean Quality of Life Assessment in Cohort A
EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. This scale ranges between 0-100, where 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine' and 100 is 'the best health you can imagine'.
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year post implant
Percentage of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Number of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort B
Number of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Time frame: 1 year post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Time frame: 1 year post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Time frame: 1 year post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Time frame: 2 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Time frame: 3 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Time frame: 4 years post implant
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Time frame: 5 years post implant