Supreme LMA and Proseal LMA in Prone Anesthetized Patient

N/AUnknownNCT01814306

Prince of Songkla University100 enrolled

Overview

There is no significant difference about success rate of two devices.

There is no significant difference about success rate of two device: efficacy and safety

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

100

Conditions

Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation

Interventions

Supreme LMADEVICE

Use Supreme LMA to compare efficay with Proseal LMA in prone position insertion

Proseal LMADEVICE

Use Proseal LMA to compare efficay with Supreme LMA in prone position insertion

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMax age: 15 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * American Society Anesthesiologists physical status I-III * Patient undergo elective orthopedics surgery in prone position under general anaesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<15year * Non-fast * Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35kg/m2) * Pregnancy * Known or predicted difficult airway * GERD * History of laryngeal problem (injury,subglottic stenosis) * Local pharyngeal problem (abscess,tumor) * Poor dentation * Pulmonary disease

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Success rate of insertion (quality of ventilation)

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary Outcomes

Ease of insertion, Complication and Glottic seal pressure

Time frame: 1 year

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.