This study was to be conducted as a multi-centre, randomized, investigator-blinded, active and vehicle-controlled, intra-individual (split-face/scalp) non-inferiority (regarding efficacy) and superiority (regarding pain) study. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of NDL-PDT compared to c-PDT in terms of lesion complete response rate.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
131
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy
Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
Metvix placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Investigative site
Montpellier, France
Investigational site
Nantes, France
Investigational site
Nice, France
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1
The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigational site
Paris, France
Investigative site
Rennes, France
Investigational site
Aachen, Germany
Investigational site
Berlin, Germany
Investigational site
Münster, Germany
Investigational site
Recklinghausen, Germany
Investigational site
Assen, Netherlands
...and 8 more locations