Dystrophinopathy is a disease continuum that includes Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which develops in boys. It is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability. A specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of dystrophinopathy in approximately 10-15 percent (%) of boys with the disease. Ataluren is an orally delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. The main goal of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the effect of ataluren on walking ability. The effect of ataluren on physical function, quality of life, and activities of daily living will be evaluated. This study will also provide additional information on the long-term safety of ataluren.
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the efficacy and safety of ataluren in participants with nmDMD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
230
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado - Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Child Neurology Center of Northwest Florida
Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline and Week 48 6MWD values are each the average of two valid 6MWD values, or a single available value if one was missing.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Time to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse compared with baseline. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD \<300 meters, \>=300 to 400 meters, and \>=400 meters was evaluated. For participants who did not have 10% 6MWD worsening or who were removed from study, time to 10% 6MWD worsening was censored at the time of the last 6MWD test. Participants who became non-ambulatory were considered to have 10% worsening.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48
During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers \[knee-ankle-foot orthoses \] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase). If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48
During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48
During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 54
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
...and 45 more locations