The purpose of this study is to compare the progression-free survival of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with VTX-2337 + cisplatin or carboplatin + 5-FU + cetuximab versus patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin + 5-FU + cetuximab alone (standard-of-care; SOC). Safety and overall survival will also be evaluated.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VTX 2337 in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab in prolonging the progression-free survival in subjects with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. OBJECTIVES: Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of VTX 2337 plus SOC to SOC alone in prolonging the PFS of patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN using irRECIST evaluated by independent radiology review. Secondary Objectives: To compare the following between the two treatment groups: * Safety of VTX 2337 by adverse events, including clinically significant changes in physical examination, peripheral blood hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and ECG. * Efficacy of VTX 2337 plus SOC in prolonging the OS of patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. * Efficacy of VTX-2337 plus SOC on ORR, DOBR, DCR, and DDC by irRECIST and evaluation by independent radiology review. * Efficacy of VTX-2337 plus SOC on ORR, DOBR, DCR, and DDC by RECIST v1.1 and evaluation by independent radiology review. * Efficacy of VTX 2337 plus SOC to SOC alone in prolonging the PFS by RECIST v1.1 and evaluation by independent radiology review. * Efficacy of VTX 2337 plus SOC to SOC alone in prolonging the PFS by irRECIST and evaluation by investigators. Exploratory Objectives: * To compare genetic polymorphisms that may impact the response of patients to a TLR8 agonist or to cetuximab between the two treatment groups. * To compare immune biomarker response to VTX 2337 plus SOC as measured by a multiplexed panel of cytokines, chemokines, and inflammatory markers between the two treatment groups. * To compare the effect of immune cell subsets within the tumor on response to VTX-2337 and/or clinical outcome, as measured by immunohistochemistry in primary tumor tissue between the two treatment groups. * To assess the PK of VTX-2337. OUTLINE: Subjects will be screened for eligibility (within 14 days) and qualified subjects will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment groups: SOC + VTX 2337 or SOC + placebo. Tumor assessments will be by CT or MRI starting at Week 12 (± 3 days), then at Week 18 (± 3 days) and every 8 weeks (± 7 days) thereafter. Response will be evaluated by immune-related RECIST criteria (irRECIST) and confirmed by an independent radiologist. Upon independent confirmation of disease progression, active participation in the study is complete and subjects will undergo the End of Treatment evaluations. Subjects will be followed for survival until \~12 months after the last subject is randomized.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
195
Comparison of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Between Treatment Groups Using irRECIST and Evaluated by Independent Radiology.
PFS was based on central assessment by a blinded independent radiologist per immune related response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (irRECIST) and was summarized and displayed by treatment arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. Treatments were compared using a stratified log-rank test controlling for randomization stratification factors. The hazard ratio between the 2 treatment arms, as well as the associated one-sided 90% CI and p-value, were presented using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Time frame: PFS is the time from randomization until disease progression or death, whichever comes first.
Comparison of Adverse Events (AEs) Between the Two Treatment Groups.
The frequency and severity of adverse events, including any clinically significant changes in physical exam, laboratory values, or other clinical assessment.
Time frame: AEs were collected from the first dose of study drug given on Cycle 1 Day 1 until 7 days after the dose of study drug or End of Treatment visit, whichever occurred first. Overall mean duration of exposure was 25.3 weeks.
Comparison of Overall Survival (OS) Between the 2 Treatment Groups.
Estimated using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates, 1-sided stratified log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model; all with 90% 1-sided confidence intervals.
Time frame: OS is the time from randomization until death due to any cause or the date last confirmed to be alive.
Comparison of the Objective Response Rate Between the Two Treatment Groups p
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve best overall response of irCR or irPR pr irRECIST and evaluated by independent radiology..
Time frame: From the time of randomization until the best response on treatment is documented.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Tower Hematology Oncology Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, United States
California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence (CCARE)
Escondido, California, United States
University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
University of California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System
Denver, Colorado, United States
Helen F. Graham Cancer Center
Newark, Delaware, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Orlando, Florida, United States
Northeast Georgia Cancer Care, LLC
Athens, Georgia, United States
...and 43 more locations