The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with celecoxib and pregabalin together would prove to be more effective in relief of pain than treatment with celecoxib alone in people who have chronic low back pain with a probable neuropathic component.
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the concomitant use of pregabalin and celecoxib compared with celecoxib monotherapy for the symptomatic relief of pain in patients with chronic low back pain with a probable neuropathic component. The secondary objectives are: * Demonstrate the additional benefit of adding pregabalin to celecoxib monotherapy. * To evaluate the concomitant use of pregabalin and celecoxib compared to celecoxib monotherapy in a set of patient reported measures (sleep, depression, anxiety, impact of pain in daily functions, patient's global impression of change and patient's perception of the treatment). * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of celecoxib and of the concomitant administration of pregabalin and celecoxib.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
180
During the first study period subjects in Arm A will be administered a daily fixed dose of celecoxib 200 mg once daily and pregabalin 150 mg (75 mg BID) for one week (during Week 0) followed by pregabalin 300 mg (150 mg BID) daily for the remaining 4 weeks. During the second study period all subjects will be administered concomitant treatment of a daily fixed dose of celecoxib 200 mg once daily and pregabalin 300 mg (150 mg BID). Subjects in Arm B will be initiated on pregabalin 150 mg (75 mg BID) daily for one week, before pregabalin will up titrated to 300 mg (150 mg BID) daily. All subjects will complete a treatment taper (a) after completing the second study period or (b) after premature study discontinuation. During treatment taper, the pregabalin dose will be decreased to 150 mg (75 mg BID) daily and subjects will participate in a follow up visit for a final safety assessment.
Subjects in Arm B will be administered a daily fixed dose celecoxib 200 mg and placebo of pregabalin for 5 weeks. During the second study period all subjects will be administered concomitant treatment of a daily fixed dose of celecoxib 200 mg once daily and pregabalin 300 mg (150 mg BID). Subjects in Arm B will be initiated on pregabalin 150 mg (75 mg BID) daily for one week, before pregabalin will up titrated to 300 mg (150 mg BID) daily. All subjects will complete a treatment taper (a) after completing the second study period or (b) after premature study discontinuation. During treatment taper, the pregabalin dose will be decreased to 150 mg (75 mg BID) daily and subjects will participate in a follow up visit for a final safety assessment.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 5 (ie, Visit 4) Compared Between the Two Study Arms
The Daily Pain diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10: Select the number that best describes your pain during the past 24 hours from 0 to10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5
Change in the Weekly Mean Pain NRS Score in Arm B, Compared Between Week 5 (Visit 4) and Week 10 (Visit 6).
The Daily Pain diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10: Select the number that best describes your pain during the past 24 hours from 0 to10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain NRS Score at Week 10 (Visit 6) Compared Between the Two Study Arms
The Daily Pain diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10: Select the number that best describes your pain during the past 24 hours from 0 to10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue Measure Scores Compared Between Arms at Week 5 (Visit 4) and at Week 10 (Visit 6)
The BSW consists of 3, single-item measures designed to capture the participant's perception of the effect of treatment in terms of the relative benefit, their satisfaction, and their intention or willingness to continue on therapy. The BSW was administered by the investigator or designated site personnel in the local language as a standardized interview during the follow-up visits. The BSW can potentially be self-administered; however, this method of administration has not been tested. Participants completed this questionnaire at Visit 4 and Visit 6.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão - CEPEC
São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
CMIP-Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
EDUMED Educação em Saúde - Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Instituto Paulista de Reumatologia da UNIFESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica e Medicina Avancada - IMA Brasil
São Paulo, Brazil
Centro de Diagnostico y Tratamiento Ltd. Clinica Siresa
Temuco, Región de la Araucanía, Chile
Centro de Investigación Clínica Neuropsicología Ltda
La Florida, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia - Instituto del Corazon Floridablanca
Floridablanca, Santander Department, Colombia
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Compared Between Arms at Week 5 (Visit 4) and at Week 10 (Visit 6)
The PGIC is a single-item, self-rated instrument that measures change in the patient's overall status since starting study medication on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), where lower scores indicate greater improvement. This scale was administered at Visit 4 and Visit 6.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Percentage of Participants With PGIC for Each Arm Compared at Week 5 (Visit 4) and at Week 10 (Visit 6)
The PGIC is a single-item, self-rated instrument that measures change in the patient's overall status since starting study medication on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), where lower scores indicate greater improvement. This scale was administered at Visit 4 and Visit 6.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean of Daily Sleep Interference Rating Scale (SIRS) Compared Between Arms at Week 5 (Visit 4) and at Week 10 (Visit 6)
The Daily Sleep Interference Rating Scale (SIRS) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("pain does not interfere with sleep") to 10 ("pain completely interferes with sleep" \[unable to sleep due to pain\]). Participants described how pain had interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours: Select the number that best describes how your pain has interfered with your sleep during the past 24 hours on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 represents 'does not interfere with sleep' and 10 represents 'completely interferes' which means you are unable to sleep due to pain.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) Anxiety Scores at Week 5 (Visit 4) and Week 10 (Visit 6)
The HADS is a self-administered questionnaire measuring anxiety. Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participants respond as to how each item applies to them on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = No anxiety, to 3 = Severe feelings of anxiety). Separate scores are calculated for each subscale and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score the more severe the anxiety.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) Depression Scores at Week 5 (Visit 4) and Week 10 (Visit 6)
The HADS is a self-administered questionnaire measuring depression. Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participants respond as to how each item applies to them on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = No depression, to 3 = Severe feelings of depression). Separate scores are calculated for each subscale and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score the more severe the depression.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Percentage of Days in Mild, Moderate and Severe Pain at Period 1 and Period 2
Period 1 indicates from Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 4 (Week 5). Period 2 indicates from Visit 4 (Week 5) to Visit 6 (Week 10). A rating of 0 is considered no pain; 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
Time frame: Period 1 and Period 2
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI sf) - Pain Severity Index Score at Week 5 and Week 10
BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during the past 24 hours. The Pain severity domain: The BPI severity domain includes pain at its 'worst,' 'least,' 'average,' and 'now' (current pain) on 0-10 NRS scales and takes the mean of these 4 items. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), therefore higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Sleep Disturbance Subscale at Week 5 and Week 10
The MOS-Sleep Scale is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. With the exception of sleep adequacy, optimal sleep, and quantity, higher scores reflect greater impairment in the MOS-Sleep subscales. Sleep Disturbance: Range=0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance. Negative changes indicate improvement.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain NRS Score at Week 5 and Week 10
The Daily Pain diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10: Select the number that best describes your pain during the past 24 hours from 0 to10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10
Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain NRS Score at Week 5 and Week 10
The Daily Pain diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10: Select the number that best describes your pain during the past 24 hours from 0 to10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Week 5 and Week 10