The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of conventionally fractionated conformal radiotherapy with CF-CRT combined with either high-dose-rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Prostate cancer is considered as a disease with relatively slow natural course and good clinical prognosis. Such description, however, does not well refer to intermediate and high-risk cases where long-term rate of biochemical progression remains not satisfactory, and the available treatment modalities entail a considerable morbidity. Over the last decade several competitive therapeutic approaches have evolved in curative treatment for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) made possible to escalate the total dose to the prostate without excessive toxicity. Based on assumption of low value of low α/β value for adenocarcinoma of prostate, there is a potential of escalating the biological dose to the tumor with higher dose per fraction. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is one of the options, with the ability to conform radiation dose to the prostate with sharp dose gradient adjacent to critical organs. An increasing number of studies suggest its usefulness as a boost in intermediate and high risk disease. The randomized trial conducted in UK compared external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone with EBRT and HDR brachytherapy as a boost. Combining EBRT with HDR BT - boost resulted in significantly higher relapse-free-survival (RFS) with comparable incidence of severe late toxicity. However, the total dose used in EBRT alone - arm and radiotherapy technique may be considered suboptimal according to current standards. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be an interesting alternative to HDR brachytherapy, not requiring implantation of multiple catheters and anesthesia. SBRT boost for advanced localized prostate cancer has the potential to reduce toxicity while escalating the dose. First results of trials combining conventional irradiation with hypofractionated stereotactic boost and institutional pilot results gave promising outcome. The comparison of these modalities of radiation therapy for prostate cancer will be performed in the current phase III trial study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
350
CF-CRT to the prostate and SV (IM risk group) or to the prostate, SV and LN (high risk group) to the TD of 50 Gy, 2.0 Gy d fx, 5 days a week over the period of 5 weeks AND A. Two 10 Gy fractions of HDR BT 1-7 d. before external beam radiotherapy and one 1-7 d. after external beam radiotherapy OR B. Two stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) fractions of 10 Gy to the prostate (CTV boost) delivered with dynamic SBRT technique (IMRT or Rapid Arc). First and second fraction of SBRT boost is scheduled 1-7 d. before and 1-7 d. after the start of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, respectively.
Conventionally fractionated EB-CRT (IMRT or Rapid Arc) to the TD of 50 Gy, followed by a boost to the prostate (26 or 28 Gy in 2.0 Gy per fraction 5 days a week over the period of 2.5 weeks) to the total dose of 76 or 78 Gy (intermediate or high risk group of patients, respectively).of 50 Gy in 2.0 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week over the period of 5 weeks, followed by a boost to the prostate (26 or 28 Gy in 2.0 Gy per fraction 5 days a week over the period of 2.5 weeks) to the total dose of 76 or 78 Gy (intermediate or high risk group of patients, respectively).
Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch
Gliwice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF)
according to Phoenix definition (rise of PSA level of 2 ng/ml over the absolute nadir)
Time frame: 3 years
Freedom from local relapse
Time frame: 3 years
Freedom from loco-regional relapse
Time frame: 3 years
Freedom from distant metastases
Time frame: 3 years
Time of occurrence, incidence and severity of acute normal tissue reactions as measured according to CTCAE v4.0 and RTOG/EORTC scoring system
Time frame: 3 months
Time of occurrence, incidence and severity late normal tissue reactions as measured according to CTCAE v4.0 and RTOG/EORTC scoring system
Time frame: 3 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hormonal treatment: three months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (MAB -maximal androgen blockade) in all patients. Long-term (3 years) of adjuvant hormonotherapy (LHRH agonists only) in high risk patients.