Bone grafting is widely used in hospitals to repair injured, aged or diseased skeletal tissue. In Europe, about one million patients encounter a surgical bone reconstruction annually and the numbers are increasing due to our ageing population. Bone grafting intends to facilitate bone healing through osteogenesis (i.e. bone generation) at the site of damage, but this is only attained presently by including cells capable of forming bone into the augmentation. Bone autograft is the safest and most effective grafting procedure, since it contains patient's own bone growing cells (to enhance osteogenesis) and proteins (to enhance osteoinduction), and it providing a scaffold for the new bone to grow into (osteoconduction). However, bone autograft is limited in quantity (about 20 cc) and its harvesting (e.g. from the iliac crest) represents an additional surgical intervention, with frequent consequent pain and complications. We hypothesize that using autologous bone marrow cells expanded in GMP facility surgically implanted with synthetic bone substitutes contribute to the resolution of the health and socioeconomic complications of delayed union or non-union after diaphyseal and metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures with safety and efficacy.
Tissue engineering combines bone marrow cells or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic scaffolds and molecular signals (growth or differentiating factors) in order to form hybrids constructs. For bone reconstruction purposes, human MSCs have been seeded and cultured on porous calcium phosphate ceramics in osteogenic media. Some clinical studies with low numbers of patients have been reported using this approach but the outcomes were inconsistent with low efficacy in bone regeneration. The reasons of the limited clinical success may be due to several bottlenecks in the multidisciplinary field of bone tissue engineering. The association in vitro of biomaterials and osteoprogenitor cells raises technical challenges and regulatory and ethic issues for the implementation of clinical trials, whereas the expansion of MSCs is now possible in GMP Facility. The expected results are to obtain bone consolidation thus healing of delayed union or non-union, as proven by imaging techniques, without using bone graft. This will prove the efficacy of the proposed IMP based on pluripotent MSCs expanded in a GMP facility and mixed with granulated biphasic calcium phosphate in the surgical setting before implantation. No expected complications related to the procedure are expected. Changes in serum levels of bone turnover markers will be described.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Implantation surgery of a synthetic bone substitute associated with autologous bone marrow cells expanded
Depatment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHRU Tours
Tours, France
Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, University of Ulm
Ulm, Germany
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna
Bologna, Italy
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología "A", Hospital La Paz
Madrid, Spain
Complication rate as percentage of patients with local complications regarding the non-union treatment in the follow-up
Time frame: At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks after the implantation surgery
Number of patients with proven bone healing
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
Amount of radiological callus
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
Clinical consolidation
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after implantation surgery
No reoperation done or scheduled
Time frame: 24 weeks after implantation surgery
Changes in serum levels of bone turnover markers
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.