The purpose of this study is to compare Baked Egg vs. Egg Oral Immunotherapy for inducing sustained unresponsiveness to egg exposure in children.
Food allergy affects 6-8 percent of children in the United States. In young children, reactions to egg can range from hives to severe life threatening allergic reactions called anaphylaxis. Current treatment for food allergy is complete avoidance of the food and to carry antihistamines and self-injectable epinephrine if an accidental reaction occurs. However, accidental exposure to allergens in processed foods may be difficult to avoid. Currently, several therapeutic strategies are being investigated to prevent and treat food allergies. Since immunotherapy injections for food allergy are associated with a high rate of allergic reactions, alternate approaches to treatment are needed. Oral (by mouth) immunotherapy (OIT) is one approach that has been tried in some studies in the treatment of food allergies. The purpose of this study is to compare baked foods with egg versus (vs.) egg OIT. The intent of the study is to investigate if participants will be able to consume egg after taking baked foods with egg or egg OIT for a period of time and then stopping for a certain period. This is referred to as tolerance or sustained unresponsiveness. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the egg OIT vs. baked egg by having each participant ingest egg white solid or baked foods with egg. This will be done over 2 years. This study will last 2 years. All eligible subjects will receive a baked egg oral food challenge (OFC). Those who pass the baked egg OFC will then have a 2 gm egg OFC. Those who react to the egg OFC will be randomized to Baked Egg or Egg OIT. Individuals who do not pass the initial baked egg OFC will be assigned to Egg OIT. Those who pass the egg OFC will not be eligible for the study and will be followed per site standard of care. All eligible and enrolled subjects will have a 1-year and a 2-year OFC. At selected visits, blood and urine collection, physical examination, prick skin tests, and atopic dermatitis and asthma evaluations will occur.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
92
Commercially available egg white solid dispensed by the central manufacturer. Study product will be dispensed in vials for low doses, capsules for mid-range doses, and bulk powder with dosing scoops for the higher doses.
Predetermined food substances with known amounts of Baked Egg (egg protein) with standardized dosing/consumption instructions.
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Sustained Unresponsiveness to Egg Consumption at 2 Years.
Sustained unresponsiveness - able to successfully consume 7444 mg egg white protein in a desensitization OFC and, after an 8-10 week egg-free interval, were also able to successfully consume 7444 mg egg white protein in an OFC after up to 2 years of therapy.
Time frame: 2 Years
Desensitization to >= 4.444 Grams Egg White Solid.
Development of desensitization to able to successfully consume \>=4444 mg egg white protein during a desensitization OFC on therapy at 1 year and 2 years.
Time frame: 1 Year and 2 Years
Incidence of All Serious Adverse Events
Incidence of all serious adverse events during the study. No statistical analyses were performed since there were no events in 2 of the 3 treatment groups and only 1 event in the third so it would not be meaningful.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Number of Participants With Unrestricted Consumption of Unbaked Egg
Number of participants who reported consumption of concentrated (unbaked) egg in their diet on the long-term follow-up questionnaire 3 years after randomization, indicating unrestricted consumption of unbaked egg. This is a qualitative questionnaire asking participants about egg in their diet, symptoms, and what treatment they received for their allergic reactions.
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States