The purpose of this research is to find out if mexiletine is safe and effective in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). In this trial, participants will be taking either 300 milligrams per day of mexiletine, 900 milligrams per day of mexiletine or placebo (non-active study drug). The safety and efficacy of these doses will be compared to see if one dose is better than the other.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting primarily motor neurons, for which treatment designed to slow or arrest progression remains lacking. Mexiletine is a use-dependent sodium channel blocker that has been FDA-approved for decades for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and more recently to treat neuropathic pain in diabetic polyneuropathy. Mexiletine has been shown also to be protective of neurons following spinal cord, head injury, and cerebral ischemia, largely by blocking excitotoxicity. Based on previous studies, mexiletine appears to penetrate into the central nervous system at concentrations sufficient to confer significant protection. Recent unpublished studies in the laboratory of Dr. Robert Brown at the University of Massachusetts have also demonstrated that mexiletine ingestion in mice genetically engineered to express high levels of mutant cytosolic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) transgene prolongs survival in these animals. As mexiletine already has FDA-approval as an anti-arrhythmic agent, much is known about the pharmacology and safety of this drug in non-ALS patients. We anticipate that by excluding subjects with a known history of cardiac disease and with the known neuroprotectant properties of this medication, mexiletine is a good choice for further study in an ALS clinical trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
75
UCLA, Neuromuscular Research Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Percentage of Participants That Discontinued Study Drug
Information on adverse effects of mexiletine will be determined at each visit by direct questioning of the subjects, clinical examination, review of concomitant medications, vital signs and laboratory test results.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline Visit Pre-Dose and Post-Dose, Weeks 2, 6, and 12, and at the Final Safety Visit, if a subject discontinues study drug early. Adverse Events will be assessed via telephone Weeks 1, 10, and 16.
Trough Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Mexiletine
Subjects will have blood drawn to assess mexiletine concentrations for pharmacokinetics (PK) at the Week 6 Visit.
Time frame: Week 6 Visit (pre-dose, hours 1, 2, 3, and 6 post-dose on Week 6)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mexiletine
Subjects will have blood drawn to assess mexiletine concentrations for pharmacokinetics (PK) at the Week 6 Visit.
Time frame: Week 6 Visit (pre-dose, hours 1, 2, 3, and 6 post-dose on Week 6)
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of Mexiletine in Plasma.
Subjects will have blood drawn to assess mexiletine concentrations for pharmacokinetics (PK) at the Week 6 Visit.
Time frame: Week 6 Visit (up to 6 hours post dose)
Mean Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)/Plasma Ratio
The concentrations of Mexiletine were measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma.
Time frame: Week 6 Visit (up to 6 hours post dose)
Mean Weekly Cramp Frequency
Time frame: Week 3-12, post titration of study medication
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Massachusetts (Worcester) Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Washington University Medical School
St Louis, Missouri, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, United States
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Maximal Pain Severity
At the Baseline Visit, subjects will be asked to recount the maximum intensity experienced with a muscle cramp in the previous 24 hours and the maximum intensity experienced with a muscle cramp in the previous 30 days. The visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to measures pain associated with muscle cramping. It will be used to measure muscle cramp intensity in this study. The scale rating is from 0-10; 0 equals no symptoms, 10 equals most severe symptoms. Subject will be provided with a muscle cramp diary to record muscle cramp intensity at home, daily.
Time frame: Weeks 3-12, post titration of study medication
Cramp Frequency - Ratios for Comparisons of Doses for Weeks 3-12
Time frame: Week 3-12, post titration of study medication
Maximal Pain Severity - Ratios for Comparisons of Doses for Weeks 3-12
Time frame: Week 3-12, post titration of study medication
Mean Pain Severity
At the Baseline Visit, subjects will be asked to recount the maximum intensity experienced with a muscle cramp in the previous 24 hours and the maximum intensity experienced with a muscle cramp in the previous 30 days. The visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to measures pain associated with muscle cramping. It will be used to measure muscle cramp intensity in this study. The scale rating is from 0-10; 0 equals no symptoms, 10 equals most severe symptoms. Subject will be provided with a muscle cramp diary to record muscle cramp intensity at home, daily.
Time frame: Weeks 3-12, post titration of study medication
Mean Pain Severity - Ratios for Comparisons of Doses for Weeks 3-12
Time frame: Week 3-12, post titration of study medication