This study is being done to find out if an investigational product called HP802-247 can help people with venous leg ulcers. Investigational means that HP802-247 has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This research is being done to compare the efficacy of HP802-247 plus compression therapy against Vehicle plus compression therapy in achieving complete wound closure over the 12-week treatment period. Vehicle looks the same as HP802-247 but contains no cells. At least 440 subjects will participate. The study is going to be conducted in approximately 5 countries at approximately 50 sites across the European Union.
See Brief Summary
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
252
Study Dosage / Usage: 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days.
HP802-247 Vehicle consists of two separate components, a fibrinogen solution (Component 1) and a cell free thrombin solution which is identical to Component 2 except that no keratinocytes and no fibroblasts are present. A single dose is created when combined on the wound surface.
Unnamed facility
Anderlecht, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Edegen, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Kortrijk, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Brno, Czechia
Unnamed facility
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Unnamed facility
Olomouc, Czechia
Unnamed facility
Pardubice, Czechia
Unnamed facility
Plzen-Bory, Czechia
...and 36 more locations
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. Following initial closure subjects returned for four weekly visits to confirm wound closure. Wounds that remained closed for four weeks were classified as confirmed closures; if a wound opened at any of the 4 visits it was not considered to have closed. For subjects who dropped from the study prior to the end of treatment, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF; wound status of closed was not imputed.
Time frame: Weekly, over 12 Weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
This key secondary outcome was based on a Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
This key secondary outcome was based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF. Treatment groups were compared for percentage of participants with closed wounds at each treatment visit.
Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Number of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound Closure
Subjects who completed the treatment period with confirmed wound closure were followed in the post-treatment period for a further two months to determine their closed wound status (remained closed/reopened), giving a measure of persistence of wound closure following completion of treatment.
Time frame: Target ulcer status observed at two (visit 1) and three (visit 2) months following initial ulcer closure.
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks
Target ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks
Target leg pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.