The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether standard volume computed tomography (CT) has impact on treatment in patients with suspicion of fractures of the wrist and carpus.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Proportion of patients with prospectively documented treatment changes after CT
This endpoint is defined as presence of difference in predefined treatment regimens before and after CT. These regimens include: -Conservative treatment on the emergency ward (functional, immobilization with bandage, cast, or closed reduction and cast), closed operative treatment (reduction and cast on operation room, percutaneous pinning, or external fixation), open surgical treatment (dorsal, radial, or palmar exposure with reduction and internal fixation). Additional regimens include: Second opinion from a colleague or consulting a different specialism.
Time frame: within same visit (i.e. in one day)
Diagnostic performance of CT and conventional radiography (CR) for fracture pattern
Fracture patterns are classified according to presence and type of fractured bones, presence of intra-articular components of distal radius fractures (including sigmoid notch involvement), presence of (fracture) dislocation or avulsion fractures of carpal bones. Standard of reference is presence of injuries at imaging, at surgery, and disability complains at 1-year follow up. In case of discrepancy, consensus will be reached at the end of the study by a panel of trauma surgeons and radiologists.
Time frame: within the same visit (one day)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.