The purpose of this research study is to determine whether Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) can improve hearing in children who are deaf and cannot receive a cochlear implants.
The goal of this MEEI Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) research study is to find new ways to improve hearing in children who are deaf and cannot receive a cochlear implant. The ABI is a surgically placed bionic implant that converts sounds into electrical signals that are directly transmitted to the cochlear nucleus, the first auditory center of the brain. For many years, ABIs have improved the hearing of patients who are deaf due to brain tumors associated with a genetic syndrome called Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). However, a number of recent studies suggest that deaf patients who do not have NF2 and are not eligible for a cochlear implant may also benefit from placement of an ABI. These preliminary studies suggest that these non-NF2 or "nontumor" patients may actually have better outcomes after ABI surgery than patients suffering from NF2. Children appear to be particularly good candidates because of their developmental plasticity and in many studies, outcomes are more favorable in children that adults. Patients who do not have NF2 and are deaf due to abnormalities in their hearing nerves or inner ears from congenital malformations, infection, disease, or injury are not cochlear implant candidates and there are no other options to improve hearing in these cases except for the ABI. Thus, the purpose of our study is to carefully analyze whether ABI surgery improves the hearing and quality of life of non-NF2 children based on subjective and objective measures of their hearing before and after ABI surgery. In particular, we plan to study ABI outcomes in non-NF2 pediatric patients, characterize the parameters used on their devices, and determine the safety profile of ABIs in these patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
9
Nucleus ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for five years following surgery.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Number of Participants With Major or Minor ABI Complications
We will track any major and minor complications peri-operatively and post-operatively in all study participants. Major complications include mortality, cerebellar contusion, facial palsy, meningitis, lower cranial neuropathy, hydrocephalus, pseudomeningocele and CSF leak. Minor complications include transient hydrocephalus, wound seroma, minor infections, balance problems, transient nerve palsies, transient dysphonia or difficulty swallowing, headache, flap problems, and non-auditory side effects. These complications will be tracked through serial clinical exams as well as patient recorded questionnaires to determine the safety profile of ABI surgery.
Time frame: 1 year from date of surgery
Change in Pure Tone Threshold (dB HL) Using the ABI
We will complete audiometric threshold testing and speech based tests to determine performance before and after ABI surgery. The measure data value was calculated as mean threshold shift in dB HL from pre-surgery (or baseline) to postoperatively (following activation of the ABI) across subjects analyzed. Only those subjects that had auditory perception abilities were included. 2/9 subjects did not have auditory perception and are not using their devices. The outcome measure time frame varies across subjects based on available followup data as this study was stopped early. Audiometric testing will include: • Behavioral pure tone threshold average (PTA) in both aided (with ABI) and unaided (without ABI)
Time frame: 1-4 years from date of surgery
Number of Participants With Similar eABR Morphology on the Day of ABI Activation Compared to Intraoperative Responses
We will measure and record the specific programmed parameters of the ABI device. Intraoperatively, evoked Auditory Brainstem Response (eABRs) will be recorded and saved. These tracings and data will be compared to the settings on activation to determine whether the same electrodes are appropriately positioned. By following these measures, we will be able to capture how electrophysiologic parameters vary (if at all) over time. The outcome measure data are the number of subjects whose eABR morphology was similar on the day of activation (4 to 8 weeks following surgery) as recorded intraoperatively during ABI surgery.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4 to 8 weeks after surgery (day of activation under anesthesia)