Effect of Ivabradine and Beta-blockers Combination Versus Beta-blockers Up-titration on Right Ventricular Pacing

Overview

The aim of this prospective, randomized and controlled trial is to evaluate the use of the ivabradine in combination to a low-dose of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) versus up-titration of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) to obtain heart rate (HR) control with reduction in RV pacing in single-chamber or dual chambers ICD recipients HF patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction (FE ≤ 40%) and an heart rate ≥ 70 bpm in sinus rhythm over a 12-months follow up. Besides the investigators want to assess if the combination of ivabradine to a low-dose of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) versus up-titration of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) may determine a lower degree of left ventricular dysfunction progression, the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias burden and ICD appropriate therapy occurrence and the improvement of quality of life in ICD heart failure patients.

Background High heart rate (HR) represent per se a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) progression, despite optimal HF therapy. Beta-blockers remain the therapy of choice in all patients with systolic HF, but they may worsen atrioventricular (AV) conduction and increase right ventricular (RV) pacing percentage. Several studies have demonstrated detrimental effects of RV pacing on cardiac function. Percent RV pacing \> 40-50% is an independent predictor of death and hospitalization for HF in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator(ICD) patients, particularly in those with preexistent left ventricular dysfunction.1,2 Cumulative RV pacing \> 2% and ejection fraction (EF) \< 40% are independent predictors for Ventricular Tachycardia(VT)/Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) occurrence in ICD patients.3 Therefore reduction of cumulative RV pacing as far as possible should be achieved in ICD patients. Ivabradine is a specific inhibitor of the If current of the sinus node, that induces a selective and dose dependent HR reduction; it is a pure HR lowering agent without effects on AV conduction or contractility.4 In HF patients implanted with an ICD ivabradine could act as an heart rate control drug in combination with a beta-blocker without increase right ventricular (RV) pacing percentage and may be an option to reduce left-ventricular dysfunction progression and ventricular arrhythmias burden and appropriate ICD therapy. Aim The aim of this prospective, randomized and controlled trial is to evaluate the use of the ivabradine in combination to a low-dose of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) versus up-titration of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) to obtain heart rate (HR) control with reduction in RV pacing in single-chamber or dual chambers ICD recipients HF patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction (FE ≤ 40%) and an heart rate ≥70 bpm in sinus rhythm over a 12-months follow up. Besides we want to assess if the combination of ivabradine to a low-dose of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) versus titration of beta-blocker (bisoprolol) may determine a lower degree of left ventricular dysfunction progression, the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias burden and ICD appropriate therapy occurrence and the improvement of quality of life in ICD heart failure patients. Endpoints of the study Primary endpoints: Right ventricular pacing percentage increase \> 50% or Cardiovascular death or Heart failure decompensation or Crossover due to worsening heart failure. Secondary endpoints: Ejection fraction decrease \< 5% and Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume decrease \<15%. Ventricular arrhythmias and ICD appropriate therapy reduction. Heart rate variability improvement NYHA Classification improvement Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) total score reduction. Right ventricular pacing percentage. Composite endpoint: cardiovascular death and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure. Crossover rate due to worsening heart failure Study protocol: Baseline assessment: Clinical visit: demographic data, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, primary cause of heart failure, NYHA class, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, drug therapy, cardiovascular hospitalizations in the last year. Rest ECG (for assessment of rest heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm or device-induced rhythm, QRS duration); Blood pressure measurement; Electronic device control (for assessment of right ventricular stimulation percentage; electrical parameters and arrhythmias diagnostic data); Echocardiogram (for assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, left ventricular ejection fraction); MLHFQ Assignment of consecutive patients to treatment with ivabradine plus beta-blocker(bisoprolol) or beta-blocker (bisoprolol) titration. Mean Heart Rate Target is 55-70 bpm for both groups. Ivabradine will be administered at a dose of 5 mg twice daily in addition to a low dose of beta-blocker (bisoprolol 1,25 or 2,5 mg). After four weeks of treatment ivabradine will be eventually lowered up to 2,5 mg twice daily in the presence of side effects (phosphenes, diplopia, headache or dizziness). Beta blocker Bisoprolol will be up-titrated biweekly starting from the initial dose of 1,25-2,5 mg daily up to the max dose of 10 mg daily or to the maximum tolerated dose. Patients are controlled in office follow-up visits after 3, 6 and 12 months, in addition to a Remote Monitoring program for clinical data and trend reviewing at least every 15 days or as soon as possible whenever a Remote Monitoring alert notification is received. Besides every 15 days patients will receive a telephone contact in order to evaluate their clinical state and to uptitrate the beta blocker therapy based on mean heart rate detected trough remote control of the ICD. Three months in-office follow-up: Clinical visit: symptoms, NYHA class, drug therapy, cardiovascular hospitalizations in the last three months. Rest ECG (for assessment of rest heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm or device-induced rhythm, QRS duration); Blood pressure measurement; Echocardiogram (for assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, left ventricular ejection fraction); Electronic device control (for assessment of right ventricular stimulation percentage; electrical parameters and arrhythmias diagnostic data) . Six months in office follow-up: Clinical visit: NYHA class, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, drug therapy, cardiovascular hospitalizations in the last three months. Rest ECG (for assessment of rest heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm or device-induced rhythm, QRS duration); Echocardiogram (for assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, left ventricular ejection fraction); Electronic device control (for assessment of right ventricular stimulation percentage; electrical parameters and arrhythmias diagnostic data). MLHFQ One year in office follow-up: Clinical visit: NYHA class, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, drug therapy, cardiovascular hospitalizations in the last three months. Rest ECG (for assessment of rest heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm or device-induced rhythm, QRS duration); Electronic device control (for assessment of right ventricular stimulation percentage; electrical parameters and arrhythmias diagnostic data). Echocardiogram (for assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, left ventricular ejection fraction); MLHFQ

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes