The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the effect of operator experience on the ability to use fiberoptic-guided intubation in children less than two years old, with and without the use of an air-Q as a conduit. The question the investigators are trying to answer is: Does the operator experience make a significant difference in the time for successful fiberoptic guided tracheal intubation with and without the use of an air-Q intubating laryngeal airway?
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of operator experience on the ability to use fiberoptic-guided intubation in children less than two years old, with and without the use of an air-Q as a conduit. The ease and time for placement of the air-Q, fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view, time for fiberoptic tracheal intubation, and peri-operative complications will also be assessed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed without use of the air-Q and timed. Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Time for successful fiberoptic tracheal intubation
The time for successful intubation will be from removal of the face mask or disconnection of the circuit from the air-Q until evidence of end-tidal CO2 is confirmed.
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Time to successful placement of the Air-Q
Successful placement of the air-Q will start with the removal of the facemask until presence of end-tidal CO2 is confirmed.
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Number of attempts to place the Air-Q
Number of attempts needed for successful placement will be recorded (maximum of 3 attempts will be considered as a failure)
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Ease for placement of the air-Q
The ease for Air-Q placement will be assessed using a subjective scale
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view
The laryngeal alignment through the devices will be graded using an established scoring system
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Peri-operative complications
Includes: Complications during the placement of the Air-Q (Laryngospasm, Bronchospasm, Desaturation, etc. Oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity at discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an average of 24 hours. Oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity at 24 hours post-operatively, measured at 24 hours after device placement/study initiation. These will be assessed by the subject's response or parents subjective assesment to standardized questions regarding oropharyngeal complaints such as sore throat, jaw pain, neck discomfort.
Time frame: Measured at 24 hours after device placement/study initiation
Number of attempts for fiberoptic tracheal intubation
Number of attempts needed for successful fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be recorded (maximum of 3 attempts will be considered as a failure)
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
Ease for fiberoptic tracheal intubation
The ease for fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be assessed using a subjective scale
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.