The purpose of this retrospective clinical evaluation is to compare VEO® single or multilevel results to XLIF® single or multilevel results relative to the safety endpoints. This study will collect retrospective data on subjects who were treated with VEO® and XLIF® at least 3 months prior to the initiation of this study. Given that fusion generally takes at least 6 months to determine, the aim of this study is not to determine fusion but to consider the short-term (out to 6 months) reported adverse events between the two cohorts. Devices used in both systems are cleared for use and conform to US regulatory requirements. The study employs these procedures and devices for uses that are consistent with their 510(k), legally cleared, labeling.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
34
Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group
Long Beach, California, United States
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Santa Ana, California, United States
NorthShore LIJ
Great Neck, New York, United States
Advanced Spine & Pain
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Safety: Number of Participants Without Major Device-related Adverse Events and/or Failures
Incidence of major device-related adverse events and/or failures, defined as those requiring revision surgery or a secondary operation, or events resulting in permanent disability or death.
Time frame: Observed for up to 6 months post-surgery
Safety
Incidence of short term peri-operative adverse events (out to 6 months post-implant) including thigh pain, numbness, paresthesia and transient leg weakness.
Time frame: Observed for up to 6 months post-surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.