The project goal is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test whether mobile phone short message system (SMS) reminders, either with or without mobile-phone based travel subsidies will improve timeliness, coverage, and drop-out rates of routine EPI vaccines in rural western Kenya.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,018
Gem and Asembo Area
Gem and Asembo Area, Siaya County, Kenya
Percent of children immunized
Time frame: Up to 12 months of age
Percent of fully immunized children (FIC) by study arm
FIC = One dose bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, three doses pentavalent (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B, haemophilus influenzae type b) vaccine, three doses polio vaccine and one dose measles vaccine. The proportion of FIC infants by 10 months of age in each of the intervention arms (SMS only and SMS + subsidy) will be separately compared to the control arm using statistical analyses that adjust for the cluster design and any socio-demographic variables that may be unequally distributed across study arms
Time frame: 10 months of age
Proportion of children vaccinated by study arm
The proportion of intervention arm infants that receive vaccination within 2 weeks of the scheduled date will be calculated for each dose of vaccine and compared to the control arm using statistical analyses that adjust for our cluster design and any socio-demographic variables that may be unequally distributed across study arms
Time frame: Within 2 weeks of each scheduled vaccine date
Proportion of children dropping out between doses
Comparison of the differences in percentages of children vaccinated with pentavalent1 and pentavalent3 in the interventions arms compared to this difference in the control arm using statistical analyses that adjust for our cluster design and any socio-demographic variables that may be unequally distributed across study arms
Time frame: Age 24 weeks
Proportion of children receiving measles and pentavalent vaccines by study arm
Comparison of vaccine coverage (pentavalent3 and measles, separately) between intervention and control arms
Time frame: Age 24 weeks (pentavalent only), 10 months and age 12 months
Proportion in each arm vaccinated by mobile phone ownership and by residential distance from a health facility
Vaccine coverage analysis stratified by mobile phone ownership and residential distance
Time frame: Age 12 months
Height-for-age,to evaluate if the interventions had impact on other health status indicators
Using regression, average height for age in each group will be compared across study groups
Time frame: Age 12 months
Direct costs for each intervention arm
Costs include SMS messages, the amount of travel subsidy transferred, and the tariffs and fees that are associated with using mobile-money. For each arm, these costs will be divided by the number of children vaccinated and comparisons will be made across study arms
Time frame: 25 months, approximate time period for deploying interventions
Bed-net usage, to evaluate if the interventions had impact on other indicators of health status
Proportion of children using bed-nets will be compared across study groups
Time frame: Age 12 months
Vitamin A coverage, o evaluate if the interventions had impact on other indicators of health status
Proportion of children who have received vitamin A supplementation will be compared across study groups
Time frame: Age 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.