The purpose of this study is to examine whether the use of genetic test information and/or health coaching in patient risk counseling for heart disease and diabetes affect health behaviors and health outcomes in active-duty Air Force (ADAF), beneficiaries or dependents and Air Force retiree patients. Total of 400 subjects will be enrolled. They will be randomly(like flipping a coin)assigned to 4 groups: 1)Standard risk assessment (SRA)only; 2)SRA plus genetic risk information (SRA+G); 3)SRA plus health coaching (SRA+HC); or 4)SRA, genetic risk information, and health coaching (SRA+G+HC). Subjects randomized to the two genetic arms will have blood collected for testing of investigational coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk markers. Participants in the two groups that include health coaching will be assigned to a trained certified health coach for a period of 6 months. The duration of the study is 12 months with 3 in person visits (baseline, 6 months and 12 months) and completion of surveys at 6 weeks and 3 month time points.
This study will examine the impact of providing genetic CHD and T2D risk information, with or without a supportive behavioral intervention, on promoting risk-reducing behaviors and improving clinical outcomes. In short, using a 4-group (2X2) randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, this study will determine whether incorporating multiple-marker genetic testing into risk counseling for CHD and T2D, coupled with a health coaching intervention will lead to greater changes in physical fitness, health behaviors, risk status and clinical outcomes in active-duty Air Force (ADAF), beneficiaries or dependents and AF retiree patients (N=400). The study will address the following task objectives: 1. Determine the main and interactive effects of multiple-marker genetic risk information incorporated into standard CHD and T2D risk counseling (Standard Risk Assessment, or SRA) and an established, structured telephonic health coaching intervention on health behavior change (diet, exercise habits, smoking cessation) over 12 months, with a focus on ADAF patients, as well as their beneficiaries and retirees. 2. Determine the main and interactive effects of genetic risk information incorporated into standard CHD and T2D risk counseling and a telephonic health coaching intervention on clinical outcomes (fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, BMI, LDL, triglycerides, total cholesterol, AF composite fitness scores) over 12 months in this AF cohort. Given the lack of RCTs on the effects of differing genetic test results, such as false reassurance and genetic determinism, we will also pursue a third, exploratory task objective: 3. Examine the differential effects of level of CHD and T2D genetic risk (# of risk alleles) on behavior change (diet, exercise habits, smoking cessation) and AF fitness scores at 12 months post baseline. Baseline data collection: After screening and informed consent, height and weight, SBP, waist circumference, current lab results (FPG, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HbA1c, and HDL) and current PHA (physical health assessment) data with fitness scores ( for active duty personnel only) will be obtained from the medical records. Subjects randomized to the two genetic arms will have blood collected for testing of investigational CHD and T2D risk markers. Randomization will take place to one of the following: SRA only; SRA plus genetic risk information (SRA+G); SRA plus health coaching (SRA+HC); or SRA, genetic risk information, and health coaching (SRA+G+HC). Risk Counseling Visit: Within four weeks after the baseline visit all participants will receive risk counseling with trained provider(s) at each clinic site. Health coaching intervention: Participants in the two groups that include health coaching will be assigned to a trained health coach for a period of 6 months (n=200). IHC (Integrative Health Coaching) sessions will be provided by telephone using a structure that has evolved in multiple trials and clinical programs at Duke Integrative Medicine. Six week, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the baseline visit, participants will be asked to complete selected surveys online. 6month and 12 month study visits: 12 months from the baseline visit, active duty participants will complete their annual PHA, required annual AF fitness testing; and all participants will complete study visits at 6 and 12 months for weight, waist circumference, BP, fasting glucose or HbA1c and lipid panels to be re-assessed. Surveys will be completed at or prior to the final 12 month visit as well.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
220
Telephonic health coaching sessions with a trained certified health coach for a period of 6 months (total of 10 biweekly calls).
In addition to the SRA subjects will receive genetic risk counseling at the risk counseling visit with a clinic provider. Genetic test results for CHD (rs10757274) and T2D (rs7903146, rs1801282, rs5219) risk variants will be incorporated into the risk profile reviewed with subjects.
Standard risk assessment for coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Standard risk factors are reviewed by a provider at a risk counseling visit with the subject.
David Grant Medical Center
Fairfield, California, United States
Dietary Intake as Measured by Percent Energy From Fat
Dietary intake as measured by percent energy from fat, adjusted for baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Dietary Intake as Measured by Daily Grams of Fiber
Dietary intake as measured by daily grams of fiber, adjusted for baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Physical Activity, as Measured by the Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS)
The Stanford Brief Activity Survey is a 2-item survey that assesses two categories of physical activity - work and leisure. There are five options for degree of activity to choose from in each of the two areas of activity. Activity categories (inactive, light-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, hard-intensity activity, and very hard-intensity) are represented in a table of different patterns. Degree of work activity is represented on the vertical axis and degree of leisure activity is represented on the horizontal axis. The overall activity level category is determined by where the two responses intersect.
Time frame: 12 months
Smoking Status
Time frame: 12 months
Medication Adherence as Measured by Morisky Adherence Survey MMAS8
Scores of the MMAS-8 range from 0 to 8. A score below 6 indicates low adherence, a score between 6 \< 8 medium adherence and a score of 8 high adherence.
Time frame: 12 months
Weight
Weight in kg
Time frame: 12 months
Waist Circumference
Waist circumference in cm
Time frame: 12 months
Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure in mmHg
Time frame: 12 months
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg
Time frame: 12 months
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) in mg/dL
Time frame: 12 months
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in mg/dL
Time frame: 12 months
Triglycerides
Triglycerides in mg/dL
Time frame: 12 months
Fasting Blood Glucose
Adjusted for baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: 12 months
Total Cholesterol
Adjusted for baseline
Time frame: 12 months
AF Composite Fitness Scores
Last annual fitness exam result, collected as pass or fail
Time frame: 12 months
Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
Time frame: 12 months
Diabetes Risk Score
Time frame: 12 months
Perceived Risk for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding CHD risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
Time frame: 6 months
Perceived Risk for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding T2D risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 months
Patient Activation Score
Patient activation is the degree to which patients accept an active role in their healthcare, and have the knowledge, skills and confidence to take care of their health. When scored as a continuous variable, the range is from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater levels of patient activation.
Time frame: 12 months
Stages of Change
These evidence-based questions are validated and based upon the Transtheoretical Model and assess an individual's readiness to make behavioral change in 5 health behavior domains (dietary intake, exercise, weight loss, smoking cessation, and medication adherence).
Time frame: 6 months
Depression, as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item measure that assesses self-reported symptoms of depression. It has been heavily used in research linking depression to heart disease. Scores range from 0-63, with 0 = minimal depression and 63 = severe depression.
Time frame: 6 months
Unmanaged Stress as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS is a 10 item survey assessing feelings and thoughts of stress. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Time frame: 6 months
Social Isolation
Single item to assess for availability of support person, where No=no support person.
Time frame: 6 months