The purpose of the study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (feedbacks of patients)of a new drug for the treatment of erythema of rosacea (central facial redness). The feedback of patients receiving the active drug will be compared to the feedback of patients receiving the placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
92
Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Percentage of Participants Who Are Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Somewhat Satisfied With the Overall Study Treatment
Percentage of participants who are very satisfied/satisfied/somewhat satisfied with the study treatment were reported.
Time frame: Day 8
Percentage of Participants With Facial Redness Questionnaire at Day 8
Percentage of participants for each category of facial redness questionnaire on Day 8 was reported. Facial redness questionnaire included 12 questions/categories 1. Satisfied with appearance, 2. Appearance acceptable, 3. Appearance concerned, 4. Embarrassed with facial redness, 5. Self-conscious, 6. Frequency control last 24 hours, 7. Frustrated, 8. Cover up or camouflage, 9. Pay attention to the known triggers, 10. Avoid the known triggers, 11. Interfering with social life, 12. Interfering with work life.
Time frame: Day 8
EuroQuality of Life-5 Dimensional-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire at Day 8
EQ-5D-3L is a 3-level, 5-dimensional format standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome used to assess the impact of study treatments on participants quality of life as follows: 1) mobility; 2) self-care; 3) usual activities; 4) pain/discomfort; 5) anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 3 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 3 indicates extreme problems. Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An increase in the EQ-5D-3L total score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Day 8
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Score of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at Day 8
DLQI was a compact health-related quality of life index that has 10 questions and depends on the participants self-declaration about experiences during the previous week. DLQI results range between grades 0 and 30. \[Grade 0-1\]: No effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 2-5\]: Small effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 6-10\]: Moderate effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 11-20\]: Very large effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 21-30\]: Extremely large effect at all on participant's life. As the DLQI scores increase, the impact of the studied disease on life becomes greater.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Hautkrankheiten
Münster, Germany
Universitäts-Hautklinik Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Tübingen, Germany
CentroDerm Gesellschaft für dermatolgische Forschung mbH (GmbH)
Wuppertal, Germany
Zentrum für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Dermatochirurgie
Wuppertal, Germany
Capio Citykliniken
Lund, Sweden
Läkarhuset Odenplan
Stockholm, Sweden
NHS Tayside
Dundee, United Kingdom
...and 4 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensional-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire (Along With a Visual Analogue Score for the Overall Health State) at Day 8
EQ-5D-3L is a 3-level, 5-dimensional format standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome used to assess the impact of study treatments on participants quality of life as follows: 1) mobility; 2) self-care; 3) usual activities; 4) pain/discomfort; 5) anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 3 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 3 indicates extreme problems. Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An increase in the EQ-5D-3L total score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Day 8
Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Grade Improvement in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA)
Evaluation of erythema by using CEA was assessed by 0 to 4 grades, where 0-Clear skin with no signs of erythema, 1- Almost clear; slight redness, 2-Mild erythema; definite redness, 3-Moderate erythema; marked redness, 4-Severe erythema; fiery redness. Percentage of participants with at least two grade improvement in the CEA was reported.
Time frame: Day 8
Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Grade Improvement in the Participant Self-assessment
Percentage of participants with at least two grade improvement in the PSA was reported. Evaluation of erythema severity by using the PSA grades (0-4): 0- No redness, 1- very mild redness, 2-mild redness, 3-moderate redness, 4-severe redness.
Time frame: Day 8
Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Day 8
Facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea (including papules and pustules) were counted by evaluator.
Time frame: Day 8
Number of Participants Reported Adverse Events
All clinical medical events, whether observed by the investigator or reported by the participant and whether or not thought to be product- or study procedure-related were considered as adverse events.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to Day 8