This study will evaluate the effect of the dietary supplement N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on electrophysiologic (EEG) markers related to cognition, as well as performance on psychological tests measuring cognition. The primary hypothesis is that participants treated with NAC will show improvements in cognitive function, as measured by EEG and performance-based tests.
Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness associated with substantial social and occupational dysfunction. While positive psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia often respond to antipsychotic medications, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment are difficult to treat, necessitating novel interventions. Cognitive deficits are an important treatment target because the degree of cognitive impairment is a critical predictor of work, education, and social functioning. Glutamatergic receptors are among the most promising biological targets for cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia. Abnormal glutamatergic signaling has long been thought to be important in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia; specifically, reduced NMDA glutamatergic receptor activity on thalamic inhibitory neurons disinhibits glutamatergic neurons projecting to the cortex, which can cause secondary dopaminergic abnormalities and lead to characteristic symptoms, including cognitive deficits. Many electrophysiological (EEG) biomarkers related to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia are thought to be linked to deficient NMDA glutamatergic neurotransmission. Additionally, neuroplasticity is thought to involve glutamatergic signaling. This pattern of linkages suggests that correcting impaired NMDA glutamatergic transmission in schizophrenia could lead to enhanced cognitive function and learning. In this pilot study, we will focus on a promising dietary supplement approach to address glutamatergic deficits, evaluating its effects by EEG biomarkers and performance-based neurocognitive assessments. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a modified amino acid that is commonly used as a dietary supplement because of its antioxidant properties. NAC modulates glutamatergic signaling as follows: In the CNS, glial cells take up NAC via cystine-glutamate antiporters, which in turn leads to increased glutamate efflux into the extracellular space. Extracellular glutamate binds to non-synaptic glutamate receptors such as the metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) type 2/3 and type 5. The net result of these events is a normalization of pathologically elevated cortical glutamate levels. We will assess EEG biomarkers associated with cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, including a recently-described biomarker for visual cortical plasticity. We will also perform a comprehensive assessment of neurocognition with the MATRICS battery, which could suggest whether certain cognitive domains are sensitive to improvement with NAC therapy. Our primary aim is to determine whether NAC administration will improve NMDA-dependent EEG abnormalities in schizophrenia. We have 3 hypotheses: (1) NAC administration will increase mismatch negativity amplitude as compared to placebo; (2) NAC administration will increase P300 amplitude as compared to placebo; and (3) NAC administration will increase gamma oscillation power and phase synchronization as compared to placebo. We also will examine whether NAC will improve measures of visual neuroplasticity, performance-based measures of neurocognition, and clinical symptoms of schizophrenia.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
26
VA West Los Angeles Healthcare Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
EEG: Change in Mismatch Negativity Amplitude
A passive attention auditory oddball paradigm will be used to assess MMN.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
EEG: Change in P300 Amplitude
P300 will be measured using an active attention auditory oddball paradigm.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
EEG: Change in Gamma Synchrony Evoked Power and Phase Synchronization
Stimuli will consist of 1-msec 93-dB clicks presented in 500-msec trains presented at 40 Hz, in 3 separate blocks with 200 trials per block. Continuous data will be epoched at -100 to 700 ms relative to stimulus onset and baseline corrected to the average of the prestimulus interval. For evoked gamma power analyses, averages will be computed on a minimum of 120 artifact-free epochs in each block. The averaged epochs across the click trains (0-512 msec) will be transformed into power spectra by fast Fourier transform (FFT). The 40-Hz power spectra will be averaged across 36-45 Hz. Time/frequency intertrial coherence analyses will be performed to assess intertrial coherence of the stimulus-driven EEG signals. In this analysis, coherence ranges from 0 (non-phase-locked random activity) to 1 (activity that is fully locked in phase across individual trials). Responses at electrode Fz will be analyzed.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
EEG: Change in Visual Cortical Plasticity
The paradigm involves assessing visual evoked potentials (VEPs) before and after exposure to tetanizing visual high-frequency stimulation (HFS).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score
The MCCB was developed as a standardized method to assess cognition in clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs. It consists of ten tests which assess seven cognitive domains (processing speed, attention, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, problem solving and reasoning, and social cognition).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score
This is a widely-used instrument that assesses 30 different symptoms (categorized into positive, negative, and general psychopathology) on a scale from 1 to 7, based on clinical interview.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) scores
The CAINS is comprised of two subscales that assess the major negative symptom subdomains: 1) Motivation and Pleasure and 2) Expression. This instrument is administered in a semi-structured clinical interview and each of 13 items is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe deficit).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks