This randomized phase II trial studies how well treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate, with or without total body irradiation before donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. Giving chemotherapy, such as treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving tacrolimus before and mycophenolate mofetil after the transplant may stop this from happening.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the better of two treosulfan-based conditioning regimens in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), by comparing 6-month progression-free survival. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the effects of two conditioning regimens on changes in gene expression profiles, and evaluate the association of gene expression profiles and disease relapse. II. Determine the incidence of progression-free survival at 1 year and 2 years after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). III. Evaluate overall survival (OS) at 6 months, at 1 year and at 2 years after HCT. IV. Determine the incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). V. Determine the incidence of chronic GVHD. VI. Determine donor chimerism around days +28 and +84. CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Arm A: Patients receive treosulfan intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days -6 to -4 and fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes on days -6 to -2. Arm B: Patients receive treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate as in Arm A and undergo low-dose total-body irradiation (TBI) on day 0. TRANSPLANT: Patients in both arms undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant or bone marrow transplant on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients with a related donor receive tacrolimus orally (PO) every 8 or 12 hours on days -3 to 56 with taper to day 180. Beginning 4-6 hours after PBSC infusion, patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil PO every 12 hours to day 28. Patients with an unrelated donor receive tacrolimus PO every 8 or 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 180. Beginning 4-6 hours after PBSC infusion, patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil PO every 8 hours to day 40 with taper to day 96. NOTE: Patients with related donors eligible for FHCRC protocol 2545 may receive cyclosporine IV, instead of tacrolimus, beginning on day -3 to day 50 with a taper to day 180. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
102
Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant
Intravenously administered Fludarabine Phosphate
Undergo allogeneic PBSC transplant
Undergo TBI
Intravenously administered Treosulfan
Correlative Studies
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Number of Participants That Did Not Progress Within 6 Months
Progression is defined as relapse
Time frame: At 6 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Acute GVHD, Graded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time frame: Up to 84 days
Incidence of Chronic GVHD Graded by the NCI CTCAE Version 4.0
Time frame: Up to 5 year
Incidence of Relapse/Progression
Time frame: Up to 5 year
NRM
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 2 year
Change in Gene Expression Profiles
Differences between arms in the changes in gene expression will be compared. 80% power to detect mean differences of approximately 1.4 standard deviation units, at the 2-sided 0.05 level of significance (with Bonferroni correction for 50 genes).
Time frame: Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant
Relapse Risk as Measured by Degree of Change in Gene Expression Profiles
Among genes identified whose expression is modified by conditioning, degree of change in expression will be evaluated to determine if it is correlated with relapse risk and offers improved prediction of relapse risk over that obtained with standard clinical parameters (cytogenetics, blast count, International Prognostic Scoring System score, minimal residual disease. To account for censoring and the competing risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM), the analysis will be a time-to-event analysis of relapse using Cox regression, with change in expression as a continuous covariate (on a log scale). 8
Time frame: Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.