This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of ipilimumab and nivolumab when given together with brentuximab vedotin, and how well they work in treating patients with Hodgkin lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement (recurrent) or has not responded to previous treatment (refractory). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as ipilimumab and nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Brentuximab vedotin is a monoclonal antibody, brentuximab, linked to a toxic agent called vedotin. Brentuximab attaches to CD30 positive cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers vedotin to kill them. It is not known whether giving brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab with or without ipilimumab may kill more cancer cells.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combinations of brentuximab vedotin and ipilimumab, brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase I) II. To evaluate the complete response (CR) rate for the regimens of brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab compared to brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase II; adult cohort \[aged \>= 18 years\]) III. To characterize the safety and toxicity of treatment combination in the pediatric population. (Phase II; pediatric cohort \[aged 12-17 years\]) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate and overall response rate (ORR), for the combinations of brentuximab vedotin and ipilimumab, brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase I) II. To evaluate the duration of remission (DOR) to these combinations and compare with the DOR achieved with the most recent prior systemic therapy. (Phase I) III. To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) in patients receiving the combination of brentuximab vedotin and ipilimumab, brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase I) IV. To evaluate the ORR, PR, and stable disease (SD) rate for the combinations of brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase II) V. To evaluate the DOR to these combinations and compare with the DOR achieved with the most recent prior systemic therapy. (Phase II) VI. To evaluate the 5 year PFS and OS in patients receiving the combinations of brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase II) VII. To further evaluate the safety and characterize the toxicity for the combinations of brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. (Phase II) CORRELATIVE STUDY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the ability of these combinations to alter tumor specific T cell immunity. (Phase I) II. To evaluate the effects of these combinations on systemic immunity. (Phase I) III. To evaluate a panel of cytokine and T cell specific biomarkers from the peripheral blood as a potential immune signature of treatment response to therapy with these combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). (Phase I) IV. To evaluate using gene expression profiling (GEP) a signature of response to these novel combinations of an antibody drug conjugate with immunomodulatory therapy. (Phase I) V. To evaluate the ability of these combinations to alter tumor specific T cell immunity, and circulating T cell phenotypes, in patients as a function of treatment response at multiple timepoints during therapy. (Phase II) VI. To evaluate peripheral blood cytokine profiles in responding and resistant patients at multiple timepoints during therapy. (Phase II) VII. To evaluate using GEP a signature of response versus (vs.) resistance to these novel combinations of an antibody drug conjugate with immunomodulatory therapy. (Phase II) VIII. To evaluate the influence of human gut microbiome dysbiosis on HL lymphomagenesis and the systemic immune response. (Phase II) IMAGING CORRELATIVE STUDY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate atypical response patterns with currently available response evaluation criteria. (Phase II) II. To correlate response evaluated using currently available response evaluation criteria with duration of response (PFS, event free survival \[EFS\], failure free survival \[FFS\]). (Phase II) III. To evaluate response patterns in different immunotherapy treatment schemes and correlate with historical data using chemotherapy. (Phase II) IV. To correlate imaging changes in all treatment schemes quantitatively with PFS. (Phase II) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate outcomes (CR, PFS) between patients with/without prior transplants. (Phase II) II. Evaluate outcomes (PFS, OS) between the patients who stay on treatment and do not go to transplant in both arms (the post auto and the few others who don't want transplant) vs the patients who go off for transplant. (Phase II) III. Evaluate outcomes (CR, PFS) in pediatric population (age 12 to \< 18 years of age) vs. adult population. (Phase II) OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of brentuximab vedotin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab followed by a phase II study. PHASE I: Patients are assigned into 1 of 3 arms. ARM I: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin intravenously (IV) over 90 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-16 and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-4, 8, 12, and 16. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-16 and nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-46. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 16 cycles and every 14 days beginning cycle 17 for up to 46 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM III: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-16, nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-46, and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 every 12 weeks for up to 9 doses. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 16 cycles and every 14 days beginning cycle 17 for up to 46 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-16 and nivolumab IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-34. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 34 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-16, nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-34, and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 every 12 weeks for up to 9 doses. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 34 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET) scan throughout the trial. Patients undergo blood sample collection and may undergo tumor biopsy on study. After completion of phase I study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 2 years. After completion of phase II study treatment, patients are followed up for 10 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
146
Undergo biopsy
Undergo collection of blood
Given IV
Undergo CT
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo PET
Children's Hospital of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Anchorage Associates in Radiation Medicine
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Radiation Therapy Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each combination (Phase I)
MTD defined as the highest dose level at which less than 33% of 6 patients experience a dose limiting toxicity, will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Upon completion of the trial, frequency of subjects experiencing toxicities will be tabulated. Toxicities will be assessed and graded according to CTCAE version 4.0 terminology. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) around the toxicity proportions will be calculated.
Time frame: 21 days
CR rate (Phase II)
The analysis of CR between two arms will be performed using exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratifying on prior brentuximab vedotin (BV) (yes versus \[vs.\] no) and age (\< 18 vs. \>= 18). Multivariable logistic regression modeling will be used to adjust for the effect of any covariates that are associated with these categorical outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Complete response (CR) rate (Phase I)
Assessed using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma and reported along with the 95% CI.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Partial response (PR) rate (Phase I)
Assessed using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma and reported along with the 95% CI.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall response rate (ORR) rate (Phase I)
Assessed using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma and reported along with the 95% CI.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Duration of response (DOR) (Phase I)
DOR will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% CI for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate the DOR achieved with the protocol therapy and with the most recent prior systemic therapy.
Time frame: From the documented beginning of response up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS) (Phase I)
OS will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% CI for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: From the date of study entry up to 3 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) (Phase I)
PFS will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% CI for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: From entry onto study up to 3 years
ORR (Phase II)
Assessed using Revised Response (Cheson) and Deauville criteria. The analysis of ORR between two arms will be performed using the CMH test stratifying on prior BV (yes vs. no) and age (\< 18 vs. \>= 18). Multivariable logistic regression modeling will be used to adjust for the effect of any covariates that are associated with these categorical outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
PFS (or modified PFS) (Phase II)
PFS will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared between arms using stratified log-rank test. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional regression model will be used to estimate hazard ratios (95% CI) and assess the relationship between other prognostic factors with time-to-event outcome. Point estimates of all endpoints will be accompanied by the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization up to 10 years
OS (Phase II)
OS will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared between arms using stratified log-rank test. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional regression model will be used to estimate hazard ratios (95% CI) and assess the relationship between other prognostic factors with time-to-event outcome. Point estimates of all endpoints will be accompanied by the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization up to 10 years
DOR (Phase II)
DOR, will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared between arms using stratified log-rank test. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional regression model will be used to estimate hazard ratios (95% CI) and assess the relationship between other prognostic factors with time-to-event outcome. Point estimates of all endpoints will be accompanied by the corresponding 90% confidence intervals. The DOR achieved with the most recent prior systemic therapy will be collected on the case report forms, and descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate the DOR achieved with the protocol therapy and with the most recent prior systemic therapy.
Time frame: From the documented beginning of response up to 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Katmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
...and 469 more locations