Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a difficult to treat molecular subtype with a poor survival. TNBC can be divided into at least two molecular entities; BRCA-like and non-BRCA-like. In this trial we would like to investigate whether a molecular subgroup exists within TNBCs that derives a benefit from atezolizumab added to first line chemotherapy.
Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets human programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has shown activity in TNBC. Early clinical trials with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy have shown that the median duration to response in TNBC is remarkably long (18 weeks) compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Since advanced TNBC is characterized by rapid disease progression, most patients with TNBC may not have the opportunity to derive benefit from immunotherapy. We hypothesize that by combining atezolizumab with paclitaxel or carboplatin-cyclophosphamide the desired rapid tumor control will be obtained with chemotherapy and subsequently atezolizumab can result in durable responses in a significant subset of patients. It is unknown whether addition of atezolizumab to first line chemotherapy in TNBC is more beneficial than adding this antibody to a second line treatment schedule. Because of this and because of the poor outcome of patients with advanced TNBC experiencing disease progression after first line palliative chemotherapy, patients who were randomized to a chemotherapy only arm in this study will be offered the opportunity to cross over to the other chemotherapy regimen plus atezolizumab at disease progression.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
304
Validate the BRCA1-like test
Validate the BRCA1-like test in predicting differential PFS with first line alkylating and platinum agents (+/- antibody add-on) when compared to paclitaxel (+/- antibody add-on) in TNBC
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
Determine whether the addition of atezolizumab to paclitaxel is more favorable than adding atezolizumab to carboplatin-cyclophosphamide for patients with PD-L1 positive tumors defined as combined positive score (CPS) 10 or higher (PFS1)
Compare the overal survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response (DOR) between the groups
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Determine whether the addition of atezolizumab to paclitaxel is more favorable than adding atezolizumab to carboplatin-cyclophosphamide (PFS1)
Compare the overal survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response (DOR) between the groups
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Improvement of objective response by adding atezolizumab
Determine whether atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy will result in more objective responses and a higher proportion of patients who are free of progression at 6 months and at 12 months
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
PD-L1 status (immunohistochemistry) in tumor infiltrating immune cells
Analyze whether PD-L1 status (immunohistochemistry) in tumor infiltrating immune cells predicts for potential differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Intratumoral CD8 and/or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
MCA
Alkmaar, Netherlands
Noordwest Ziekenhuis Groep
Alkmaar, Netherlands
ZGT
Almelo, Netherlands
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, Netherlands
BovenIJ
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, Netherlands
AZVU
Amsterdam, Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Gelre Ziekenhuis
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Netherlands
...and 39 more locations
Analyze whether intratumoral CD8 and/or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) predict for differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Compare PFS between alkylating-platinum regimen to paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy in BRCA1-like patients
Evaluate whether an alkylating-platinum regimen is more effective than paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy regarding PFS in BRCA1-like TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Compare PFS between alkylating-platinum regimen to paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy in non BRCA1-like patients
Evaluate whether an alkylating-platinum regimen is more effective than paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy regarding PFS in non BRCA1-like TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
TNBC molecular subtypes- based on RNA -expression analysis
define whether different TNBC molecular subtypes- based on RNA -expression analysis - predict for differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
pretreatment LDH level
define whether pretreatment LDH level predicts for differential benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for objective response gain
Define predictive biomarkers for objective response gain of the addition of atezolizumab to first line chemotherapy; e.g PD-L1, intratumoral CD8, TILs and pre-treatment LDH
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain- chemotherapy
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain of carboplatin-cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel chemotherapy
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain - atezolizumab
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain of addition of atezo lizumab to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Determine PFS in cross over
Determine the PFS and objective response after cross over to the other chemotherapy regimen with atezolizumab (PFS2)
Time frame: At 6 and 12 months and up to 120 months
Overal Response Rate (ORR)
proportion of patients that is free of progression at 6 months and at 12 months after cross-over to the other chemotherapy regimen with atezolizumab
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Benefit Atezolizumab
Evaluate whether addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy in first line is more beneficial than when added in second line
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Overall survival (OS)
Evaluation of overall survival (OS) for all (sub)group comparisons as pre-specified
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
Toxicity of all study regimens
Adverse events will be graded according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.03
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year
Efficay in patients treated with or without Bevacizumab
Evaluate preliminary efficacy by PFS and OS in subgroups of patients treated before amendment 3 with carboplatin/cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Determine PFS in BRCA like TNBC
Determine whether an alkylating platinum regimen is more effective then paclitaxel regarding PFS in BRCA like TNBC
Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or date of death, which ever comes first, assessed up to 120 months
putative predictive potential of BRCA1-like status
Evaluate putative predictive potential of BRCA1-like status in various subgroups defined by treatment regimen received before amendment 3.
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months