Assessment of handheld fundus images in comparison to conventional fundus camera images.
This study is comparing a small handheld camera with a standard fundus camera for image quality
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
8
diagnostic imaging with two types of retina camera
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Percentage of photographs that score a "3" or higher on the grading scale
Photos will be evaluated by ophthalmologists and scored as follows: 1. Unacceptable: cannot see fundus detail 2. Unacceptable: fundus detail visualized, but inadequate for meaningful analysis 3. Acceptable: fundus detail visualized enough to make general comments, with modest improvement image would be of sufficient quality for widespread use 4. Good: fundus detail visualized, meaningful analysis possible, standard photograph superior 5. Excellent: fundus detail visualized as well as standard photograph 6. Superior: fundus detail of higher quality than standard photograph
Time frame: 2-3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.