Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab at Week 16 in participants with non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). To evaluate the safety of subcutaneous sarilumab in participants with NIU. To evaluate the change in macular edema. To evaluate the change in other signs of ocular inflammation. To evaluate the effect on retinal vessel leakage. To evaluate the effect of sarilumab on reducing concomitant immunosuppressant therapy. To evaluate the change in ocular inflammation in the anterior chamber. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of sarilumab in NIU participants. To evaluate the immunogenicity with anti-drug antibodies (ADA).
The total duration per participant was up to 58 weeks, which included a 2 week screening period, 16 weeks principal treatment period (Part A), 34 weeks extension treatment period (Part B) or open label treatment period (Part C), and 6 weeks after last treatment administration. Participants with decrease in vitreous haze (VH) ≥2; or corticosteroids dose \<10 mg/day at Week 16 were considered as responders. Participants who did not complete the principal treatment period (Part A) due to lack of efficacy; or no decrease in VH ≥2 and corticosteroids dose ≥10 mg/day at Week 16; or no decrease in VH ≥2 and corticosteroids dose missing at Week 16; or non-responder according to medical review, were considered as non-responders. Responder participants, observed at Week 16 (at the end of Part A), were invited to continue in the extension treatment period (Part B). Non-responder participants, observed within the first 16 weeks, were offered to be treated by open-label sarilumab (Part C).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
58
Pharmaceutical form: Prefilled syringes; Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Pharmaceutical form: Tablet or Capsule; Route of administration: Oral
Pharmaceutical form: Tablet or Capsule or Suspension; Route of administration: Orally or intravenously or intramuscular
Pharmaceutical form: Tablet or Capsule; Route of administration: Oral
Pharmaceutical form: Prefilled syringes; Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Investigational Site Number 840008
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Investigational Site Number 840009
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Investigational Site Number 840005
Slingerlands, New York, United States
Investigational Site Number 840007
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Investigational Site Number 840006
Arlington, Texas, United States
Investigational Site Number 203001
Brno, Czechia
Investigational Site Number 203002
Prague, Czechia
Investigational Site Number 250001
Paris, France
Investigational Site Number 250002
Paris, France
Investigational Site Number 380001
Milan, Italy
...and 10 more locations
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2-step Reduction in Vitreous Haze (VH) or Prednisone Dose <10 mg/Day at Week 16
At least 2-step reduction in VH per central review from baseline was evaluated on Miami 9-step scale. VH is the obscuration of fundus by vitreous cells and protein exudation. Each of the 9-step scale (from grade 0 \[low opacity\] to 8 \[more opacity\]) images (in increasing order of opacity) are equivalent to approximately 0.3 log units of degradation in visual acuity based on the Bangerter calibration. Participants with prednisone dose \<10 mg/day (or equivalent oral corticosteroid) were also evaluated.
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in VH Scale at Week 16
Change from baseline in VH scale was evaluated on Miami 9-step scale. VH is the obscuration of fundus by vitreous cells and protein exudation. Each of the 9-step scale (from grade 0 \[low opacity\] to 8 \[more opacity\]) images (in increasing order of opacity) were equivalent to approximately 0.3 log units of degradation in visual acuity based on the Bangerter calibration. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated using mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) model with treatment groups, visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects as well as fixed continuous covariate of baseline adjudicated VH.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Score = 0 or At Least 2-step Reduction in Score at Week 16
Participants with AC cell score = 0 or with ≥2 step reduction from baseline at Week 16 were evaluated. Slit lamp examinations were conducted at each visit to assess AC cell count. The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm × 1 mm slit beam was used to determine the grade according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria: grade 0 = no cells; grade +0.5 = 1 - 5 cells; grade +1 = 6 - 25 cells; grade +2= 26 - 50 cells; grade +3 = too many to count.
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at Week 16
BCVA score is based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters, and then at 1 meter. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (\<4, \>=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline BCVA.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) At Week 16
CRT was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. All images were transmitted to the central reading center. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (\<4, \>=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline CRT.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in CRT at Week 16
CRT was measured by SD-OCT, a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. All images were transmitted to the central reading center. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of VH level (\<4, \>=4), visits and visit-by-treatment groups interaction as fixed categorical effects, as well as, fixed continuous covariate of baseline CRT.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With CRT Thickness <300 Microns at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Without Retinal Vessel Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography (FA) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Prednisone Dose of ≤5 mg/Day (or Equivalent Oral Corticosteroid) at Week 16
Participants with prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day (or equivalent oral corticosteroid) at Week 16 were evaluated.
Time frame: Week 16
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment: Serum Functional Sarilumab Concentration
Serum functional (unbound) sarilumab concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 294 ng/mL. Concentrations below LLOQ were set to zero for samples at predose. Post-treatment concentrations below LLOQ were replaced by LLOQ/2. The samples were considered non-eligible for the analysis if the previous dosing time was \<11 days or \>17 days before the sampling time for every other week regimens.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 (Baseline), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 52, and end of study (EOS) (Week 56)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.