Clinical research, like all science, is self-correcting, with errors detected by the scientific community and communicated to the publishing journals, which then relay the information (and its resolution) to its readers. If this relaying process fails, science grinds to a halt. In this study we are testing its integrity.
This prospective study documents the outcome of notification to journal editorial boards (or equivalent authorities) of factually incorrect or inconsistent claims, in reports they have published.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
International Centre for Circulatory Health
London, London, United Kingdom
Time to correction, retraction, or other notification to the readership of discrepancy
Time frame: 12 months
Time to initial response from journal
Time frame: 0-4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.