Research Protocol Abstract: This is a phase II controlled trial (RCT) of a "storytelling" intervention compared to no treatment among surrogates who have participated in a decision to limit life-sustaining treatment in the ICU for an incapacitated loved one. Subjects will be sequentially assigned to "storytelling" (a facilitated elicitation of the experience 2-4 weeks after bereavement) or no treatment with follow up "monitoring of well-being". Subjects will receive print bereavement brochures at 1 week, and undergo telephone symptom assessment at 2-weeks, 3-months, and 6-months after bereavement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
115
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Acute referral to mental health services
We will assess acute risk of self-harm (or harm to others) and subsequent required referrals to mental health crisis services in participants throughout the intervention interview. Trained clinicians conducting interviews will refer when needed and record the number of participants requiring this service. Less than 5% of participants requiring an acute mental health crisis referral will be considered acceptable and an indicator of study safety.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks after patient death (during or after participation in study intervention interview)
Research approach rates (participant interest)
We will record the number of eligible surrogate decision makers who agree to be approached by a study staff member to hear about this research project, when asked by a member of their patient's clinical team. These counts will be summarized to assess a percentage and rate of eligible surrogates who agree to research approach among those who are eligible.
Time frame: start of recruitment - 6 months
Randomization
We will randomize participants who consent to participation in the 2nd portion of the study, after completion of a baseline questionnaire. Eligible participants will be randomized with equal numbers of participants in the intervention and control groups. Randomization of 30 eligible participants to the intervention group and 30 to the control will be considered successful and an indicator of study feasibility.
Time frame: 2- 6 weeks after patient death
Experience of participation
We will ask participants to report their experience of study participation by asking them, "How did participation in this study make you feel?" Five (5) answer choices will be given: Much better, Better, Neither better nor worse, Worse, or Much worse. 10% or fewer participants reporting that the study made them feel 'Worse' or 'Much Worse' will be considered successful and an indicator of study acceptability.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 months (end of study participation)
Burdensomeness of participation
We will ask participants to report how burdensome they felt participation in this study was for them by asking whether they Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Disagree, or Strongly disagree with this statement: "Participating in this study was burdensome." 10% or fewer participants reporting that the study was burdensome, with a response of 'Strongly Agree' or 'Agree' will be considered successful and an indicator of study acceptability.
Time frame: 6 months (end of study participation)
Participation regret
We will ask participants to report if they regret participation in this study by asking whether they Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Disagree, or Strongly disagree with this statement: "I wish I hadn't agreed to participate in the study." 10% or fewer participants reporting that they regret their participation in this study, with a response of 'Strongly Agree' or 'Agree' will be considered successful and an indicator of study acceptability.
Time frame: 6 months (end of study participation)
enrollment rate
We will assess enrollment rate by recording the number of eligible participants who consent to participate and do participate in the intervention or control. The rate of enrollment will compare the number in this consented, participating group with the overall number of eligible participants encountered. We will consider an enrollment rate greater than 60% to be successful and an indicator of study feasibility.
Time frame: start of recruitment - end of study
completion of intervention session
We will record the number of eligible participants randomly assigned to the intervention session who complete the intervention session. We will calculate a rate of completion for the intervention session. A completion rate of 80% or greater will be considered successful and an indicator of study feasibility.
Time frame: 2 - 6 weeks after patient death
follow up questionnaire completion
We will record the number of participants who complete the 3-month follow up questionnaire. A completion rate of 80% or greater will be considered successful and an indicator of study feasibility.
Time frame: 3 months +/- 9 days
follow up questionnaire completion
We will record the number of participants who complete the 6-month follow up questionnaire. A completion rate of 70% or greater will be considered successful and an indicator of study feasibility.
Time frame: 6 months +/- 18 days