This study was done to look at a method of hormonal birth control, called the NuvaRing, and specific anti-HIV medications, called antiretrovirals (ARVs). Some studies of women who use a hormonal birth control method (specifically oral pills, patches, and injections) and take ARVs have shown that ARVs interact with the hormones released by the birth control medication. These interactions may cause the birth control to be less effective at preventing pregnancy. There is also concern that hormonal birth control can increase HIV spreading to others, but more studies are needed to determine if this is true. The investigators did not know whether the NuvaRing and ARVs interact when they are used together, so this study looked to see if certain ARVs (efavirenz and atazanavir/ritonavir) interact with the two hormones released by NuvaRing. This will help us to determine if NuvaRing is safe and effective for women with HIV infection who are taking ARVs. The study also included HIV-infected women who were not on ARVs but used the NuvaRing to show us what the hormone levels are like in a similar group of women not on ARVs. Vaginal rings are also currently being studied to deliver anti-HIV medications that may prevent HIV acquisition, and to provide birth control over a longer period of time (more than 1 month). Since vaginal rings will become more commonly used to administer medications, the investigators wanted to better understand the potential for drug interactions with drugs given vaginally. This study will also help us understand the potential for drug interactions between ARVs given orally, and other drugs given through vaginal rings, like the NuvaRing. Additionally, this study will help us understand how hormones released from a vaginal ring affect the amount of HIV virus in the genital tract, the bacterial make-up (microbiome) of the female genital tract, and the immune system within the genital tract, all of which may affect the chances of spreading HIV.
This was a 28 day study from study entry through the final clinic visit. Post-entry visits were scheduled at Days 7, 14, 21 and 28. The Nuvaring was put in place at study entry and removed on day 21. A single pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample was collected for assay of etonogestrel (ENG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) at entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement), and on days 7, 14, and 21 after placement of the NuvaRing. For participants on the ARV arms, intensive, 8-hour PK sampling, for assay of efavirenz (EFV) and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) respectively, was performed at study entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement) and 21 days later. ARV sampling was performed at pre-dose (hour 0), and 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose. Safety was assessed at each study visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
84
NuvaRing is made of ethylene vinylacetate copolymers (28% and 9% vinylacetate) and magnesium stearate, is latex free, and contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. NuvaRing has an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4mm. Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days). After being in place for the first 21 days of the study, the ring may be removed after the day 21 study visit evaluations have been completed.
Participants received EFV 600 mg daily with two or more NRTIs
Participants received ATV/r 300 mg/ 100 mg daily with tenofovir and one or more additional NRTIs
Participants received 300 mg of tenofovir in Arm C
Participants received two or more NRTIs in Arm B and one or more NRTIs in Arm C
31788 Alabama CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Southern California LA (5048)
Los Angeles, California, United States
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA NICHD CRS (5112)
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado Denver NICHD CRS (5052)
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Florida Jacksonville (5051)
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Rush University Cook County Hospital Chicago NICHD CRS (5083)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
31786 New Jersey Medical School Clinical Research Center CRS
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Columbia Physicians and Surgeons CRS (30329)
New York, New York, United States
Jacobi Medical Center Bronx
The Bronx, New York, United States
The Miriam Hosp. ACTG CRS (2951)
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
...and 11 more locations
Etonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample for measurement of etonogestrel on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Time frame: Day 21
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 21
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The PK blood sample for measurement of ethinyl estradiol on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL ; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
Time frame: Day 21
Etonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Time frame: Study days 7 and 14
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
Time frame: Study days 7 and 14
EFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of EFV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of ATV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
ATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Tmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/f defines apparent oral clearance.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
Ritonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmin of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Tmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter CLss/F of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mL
This evaluates the short-term impact of Nuvaring on virologic suppression in participants who have been administered Nuvaring alone or together with EFV or ATV/r by measuring proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 copies/mL at study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and study day 21 (three weeks after vaginal ring placement). An FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay was required.
Time frame: Study day 0 and study day 21
Percentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
This evaluates toxicity and safety of NuvaRing alone, NuvaRing with EFV, and NuvaRing with ATV/r. Signs/symptoms were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table was used. Participants with sign(s)/symptom(s) of grade 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (potentially life-threatening) or 5 (death) are included in the percentage. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the study co-chairs and DAIDS clinical representative.
Time frame: From day 0 to day 28
Proportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.
This evaluates alterations in progesterone levels due to the potential PK interaction between NuvaRing and the ARVs EFV and ATV/r by examining progesterone levels at study days 0 (before vaginal ring placement), 7, 14, and 21 (before vaginal ring removal), and study day 28, without regard to menstrual cycle status at study entry.
Time frame: Study days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.