Although multiple studies have clearly demonstrated that ranibizumab therapy is more effective than laser alone for vision gain and avoiding vision loss in patients with central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), only eyes with poor visual acuity, such as a visual acuity letter score of 78 or worse (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 or worse) were eligible. Eyes that have central-involved DME with "good" visual acuity (20/25 or better) have not been addressed systematically by recent studies for treatment of DME. Baseline cohort characteristics from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) suggest that a substantial percentage of eyes with central-involved DME may retain good vision. The investigators do not know definitively whether eyes with central-involved DME and good vision do better with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) (e.g. aflibercept) therapy initially, or focal/grid laser treatment or observation initially followed by anti-VEGF only if vision worsens. The primary objective of the protocol is to compare the % of eyes that have lost at least 5 letters of visual acuity at 2 years compared with baseline mean visual acuity in eyes with central-involved DME and good visual acuity defined as a Snellen equivalent of 20/25 or better (electronic-ETDRS letter score of 79 or better) that receive (1) prompt focal/grid photocoagulation + deferred anti-VEGF, (2) observation + deferred anti-VEGF, or (3) prompt anti-VEGF. Secondary objectives include: * Comparing other visual acuity outcomes between treatment groups, such as the percent of eyes with at least 5, 10 and 15 letter losses in visual acuity from baseline mean visual acuity, percent of eyes with at least 5 letter gain in visual acuity from baseline, mean visual acuity, mean change in visual acuity, adjusted for baseline mean visual acuity * For eyes randomized to deferred anti-VEGF, the percentage of eyes needing anti-VEGF treatment * Comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes, such as the mean change in OCT central subfield (CSF) thickness, adjusted for baseline mean thickness * Comparing the number of eyes with PDR at randomization, proportion of eyes avoiding vitreous hemorrhage or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or vitrectomy for PDR between treatment groups * Comparing safety outcomes between treatment groups * Comparing associated treatment and follow-up exam costs between treatment groups
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
702
Focal/grid laser performed at baseline and as needed during follow-up
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed on the day of randomization and up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Arizona Retina and Vitreous Consultants
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of Arizona Medical Center/Department of Ophthalmology
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Retinal Diagnostic Center
Campbell, California, United States
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, United States
Number of Eyes With at Least 5-letter Decrease in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800).
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Eyes With at Least 5-letter Increase or at Least 5-, 10-, or 15-letter Decrease in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800).
Time frame: 1 year
Change in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800).
Time frame: 1 year
Change in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline Over 2 Years (Area Under the Curve)
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800). The area under the curve (units = letters·years) was divided by 2 years (units = years) to obtain an average change in letter score (units = letters) over the 2-year follow-up.
Time frame: 2 year
Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Eyes With at Least 1 or 2 Logarithmic-step Central Subfield Thickness Improvement and Worsening
Logarithmic transformation of optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness (CST) is calculated by taking the log base 10 of the ratio of the central subfield thickness divided by 200 and rounding to the nearest hundredth. The change is the change in the log values.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Eyes With no Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema and at Least 10% Central Subfield Thickness Decrease
Center-involved diabetic macular edema defined as follows by central subfield thickness according to optical coherence tomography machine and sex: Heidelberg Spectralis ≥ 305 µm in women and ≥ 320 µm in men, and Zeiss Cirrus ≥ 290 µm in women and ≥ 305 µm in men.
Time frame: 1 year
Cumulative Number of Intraocular Injections of 2.0-mg Aflibercept Received Per Participant
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Eyes With ≥ 2-step Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy
Includes eyes with baseline severity level of 75 (high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy) or less based on reading center grading of color fundus photographs using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scale.
Time frame: 2 years
For Eyes Randomized to Initial Laser Photocoagulation and Initial Observation Groups, the Percentage Receiving Aflibercept Treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Eyes With at Least 5-, 10-, or 15-letter Decrease in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800).
Time frame: 2 years
Change in E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/12) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/800).
Time frame: 2 years
Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline
Measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Eyes With at Least 1 or 2 Logarithmic-step Central Subfield Thickness Improvement and Worsening
Logarithmic transformation of optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness is calculated by taking the log base 10 of the ratio of the central subfield thickness divided by 200 and rounding to the nearest hundredth. The change is the change in the log values.
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Eyes With no Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema and at Least 10% Central Subfield Thickness Decrease
Center-involved diabetic macular edema defined as follows by central subfield thickness according to optical coherence tomography machine and sex: Heidelberg Spectralis ≥ 305 µm in women and ≥ 320 µm in men, and Zeiss Cirrus ≥ 290 µm in women and ≥ 305 µm in men.
Time frame: 2 years
Cumulative Number of Focal/Grid Photocoagulation Sessions Performed Per Participant
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Eyes With ≥ 2-step Improvement of Diabetic Retinopathy
Includes eyes with baseline severity level of 35 (mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy) or greater based on reading center grading of color fundus photographs using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scale. Excludes eyes with severity level 60 at baseline since improvement is not possible in these eyes.
Time frame: 2 years
Cumulative Number of Intraocular Injections of 2.0-mg Aflibercept Received Per Participant
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
South Coast Retina Center
Long Beach, California, United States
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Palm Desert, California, United States
Retina Consultants of Southern California
Redlands, California, United States
Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.
Sacramento, California, United States
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, United States
...and 93 more locations