The main purpose of this prospective, multicenter, open-label phase II study, was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pasireotide alone or in combination with cabergoline in patients with Cushing's disease.
This was an open-label, multi-center, international, non-comparative study with adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of Cushing's disease. Given the fact that CD patients may need a multimodality treatment approach, the trial design aimed to mimic CD treatment by using a medical stepwise approach. Therefore, the whole patient population started treatment with Pasireotide and only in patients within this population who did not achieve biochemical control, cabergoline was added. The whole patient population had never received pasireotide or had received it in the past (reasons of discontinuation not related to safety). Core Phase * Pasireotide naïve patients started pasireotide monotherapy at the dose of 0.6 mg s.c. bid. If at the end of the 8 week treatment period, the biochemical control was not achieved and the 0.6mg bid dose was well tolerated, the pasireotide dose was increased to 0.9mg bid. If the 0.9mg bid dose of pasireotide did not lead to biochemical control, cabergoline was added with a starting dose of 0.5mg qd. If the combination dose of 0.9mg bid of pasireotide plus 0.5mg qd cabergolinedid not achieve biochemical control, the cabergoline dose will be increased to 1.0mg qd. * Patients who were currently being treated with maximal tolerated doses of pasireotide monotherapy for at least 8 weeks at screening without achieving normal mUFC, entered the study with a combination therapy starting with cabergoline 0.5mg qd. Extension Phase • After 35 weeks of treatment in core phase, patients had the option to continue study treatment if pasireotide was not yet approved for commercial use and/or reimbursed - if country reimbursement was applicable - in each respective country, or until 31st December 2017, or once an applicable roll over protocol became available, or whichever occurred first. Novartis had a local transition plan in order to ensure that all trial patients had access to the study medication without any delay in their treatment
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
68
The trial consisted of Pasireotide-untreated patients who started pasireotide 0.6mg twice a day for 8 weeks. If biochemical control was not achieved by the end of the 8 weeks, and the 0.6mg dose is well-tolerated, the dose was increased to 0.9mg twice a day for another 8 weeks. If biochemical control is not achieved, cabergoline was added and patients began combination treatment with cabergoline at the starting dose of 0.5mg once a day for 8 weeks. If biochemical control is still not achieved at the end of the third 8 week period, the dose of cabergoline was increased to 1.0mg once a day. Patients could also immediately start the combination treatment by adding cabergoline 0.5mg once a day at study entry to their current maximal tolerated dose of pasireotide. Patients continued with the combination treatment for 8 weeks. If biochemical control was not not achieved by the end of the 8 week period, the dose of cabergoline was increased to 1mg once a day.
Percentage of Responders With Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) ≤ 1.0xULN Collected or Imputed at Week 35
Participants who attained mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN (upper limit of normal) with pasireotide alone or in combination with cabergoline. The 24h-UFC concentration results from three samples, collected during the screening period, were averaged to obtain the Baseline urinary free cortisol level. mean 24h-UFC was determined from two 24-hour urine collections collected on two consecutive days that occurred before the visit. Imputation: subjects who completed the end of treatment visit at Week 35, but had missing evaluation of mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC). The last available mUFC assessment at or after previous visit (week) before last week was carried forward as the last week mUFC assessment.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 35
Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) at Scheduled Visits
Mean value of mUFC at each scheduled visit was determined from two 24-hour urine collections collected on two consecutive days that occurred before the visit when UFC was measured.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 8 weeks during extension
Percentage of Responders With Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) ≤ 1.0xULN
Actual mean value of mUFC at each scheduled visit was determined from two 24-hour urine collections collected on two consecutive days that occurred before the visit when UFC was measured.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 235
Percentage of Participants Who Attain mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or Have at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in mUFC
Actual mean value of mUFC at each scheduled visit was determined from two 24-hour urine collections collected on two consecutive days that occurred before the visit when UFC was measured.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 235
Duration (Weeks) of Controlled or Partially Controlled Response
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama at Birmingham The Kirklin Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Oregon Health and Science University SOM230B2411
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
...and 19 more locations
Duration of controlled or partially controlled response is defined as the period starting from the date of patient's first normalization (mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN) or at least 50% reduction from baseline up to the date when the patient's mUFC \> 1.0 x ULN and the reduction from baseline falls to less than 50% from the first time
Time frame: from the date patient's first normalization (mUFC ≤ 1.0xULN) or at least 50% reduction from baseline up to the date when the patient's mUFC > 1.0 x ULN
Plasma Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)
A pre-dose blood draw for plasma ACTH sampling was taken at visits. Samples were analyzed by a central laboratory.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 8 weeks during extension
Serum Cortisol Levels
A pre-dose blood draw for an 8 am fasting serum cortisol measurement were taken at visits. Samples were analyzed by a central laboratory.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 8 weeks during extension
Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 35
The mean arterial blood pressure determinations were obtained in the sitting position. Three measurements were taken with 5 minute intervals and the mean was used for study specific procedures
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 35
The mean arterial blood pressure determinations were obtained in the sitting position. Three measurements were taken with 5 minute intervals and the mean was used for study specific procedures
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
Body Weight at Week 35
Weight was was one of the measures of clinical symptoms of CD
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
Body Mass Index at Week 35
Body mass index was one of the measurements of clinical symptoms of CD. Body mass index=weight in kg divided by the square of the body height (in meters)
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
Waist Circumference at Week 35
Waist circumference was one of the measurements of clinical signs of CD
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
LDL, HDL and Total Cholesterol at Week 35
LDL=Low density lipoprotein, HDL=high density llipoprotein and total protein were analyzed by a central laboratory
Time frame: Baseline and week 35
Mean Scores of Cushing QoL Standardized Score at Week 17 and 35
Patients who completed nine or more items for the 12-item Cushing's syndrome QoL questionaire were considered evaluable for that assessment. Raw scores were obtained for the 12 items using the following scoring: 1) always or very much, 2) often or quite a bit, 3) sometimes or somewhat, 4) rarely or very little, 5) never or not at all. Then the standardized score, Y, was calculated for each patient as follows: Y = 100\* (X - n) / n\*5 - n\*1) = 100 \* (X - n) / 4\*n where X denoted the raw score and n the number of questions answered by the patient. The higher the score, the better the QoL. The best possible standardized score was 100 and the worst possible standardized score was 0
Time frame: Baseline and week 17 and 35
Mean Scores of SF-12v2 Domain Scores at Week 17 and 35
SF-12v2 General Health Survey is a general patient reported outcome instrument over time. It is scored to provide eight health domain scores (Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), Vitality (VT) and Mental Health (MH)). These eight domain scores can be combined to form two summary scores reflecting overall physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The analyses reported here focus on PCS and MCS scores. The domain scores use a norm-based score, which standardizes the scores with respect to the mean and standard deviation of a nationally representative sample of United States (US) adults. These are the scores on the original scale which have not been transformed in any way. The possible range of scores is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, week 17 and 35
Number of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Symptom of Hypercortisolism From Baseline - Facial Rubor
Clinical symptoms include: facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up were taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position were taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs were assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 16 weeks during extension
Number of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Symptom of Hypercortisolism From Baseline - Hirsutism
Clinical symptoms include: facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up were taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position were taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs were assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 16 weeks during extension
Number of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Symptom of Hypercortisolism From Baseline - Striae
Clinical symptoms include: facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up were taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position were taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs were assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 16 weeks during extension
Number of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Symptom of Hypercortisolism From Baseline - Supraclavicular Fat Pad
Clinical symptoms include: facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up were taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position were taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs were assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 8 weeks during extension
Number of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Symptom of Hypercortisolism From Baseline - Dorsal Fat Pad
Clinical symptoms include: facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up were taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position were taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs were assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 16 weeks during extension
Number of Participants With Shift From Mild to Severe in Clinical Signs of Hypercortisolism
Facial rubor, hirsutism, striae, and supraclavicular and dorsal fat pad were assessed. Two photographs, one frontal and one lateral from the shoulders up will be taken to assess facial plethora, supraclavicular and dorsal fat pads. Two photographs, frontal and dorsal of the trunk with patient in standing position will be taken to assess striae, and hirsutism. The photographs must be assessed by a qualified physician at the site. Improvement=decrease in severity of symptom since baseline
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4, every 4 or 5 weeks during core, every 8 weeks during extension
Number of Patients With Shift From Standing Easily to Not Being Able to Stand
To test proximal muscle strength patients should be placed in a low seated position (for instance on an examination room stool). They should be asked to extend the arms in front of them. From this seated position patients will be asked to stand up. Patients will be evaluated using the following scale: 3. - completely unable to stand 2. - able to stand only by using arms as assistance 1\. - able to stand after several efforts without using arms as assistance 0. - able to stand easily with arms extended
Time frame: Baseline up to week 267