High blood glucose levels in hospitalized patients with diabetes are associated with increased risk of medical complications and death. Improved glucose control with insulin injections may improve clinical outcome and prevent some of the hospital complications. Increasing evidence indicates that incretin-based agents are safe and effective for the hospital management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Liraglutide is a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) analogue approved for the treatment of T2D. Liraglutide has been shown to lower blood glucose, stimulate endogenous insulin secretion, decrease plasma glucagon levels, inhibit gastric emptying, reduce food intake and body weight and improve ß-cell function when administered subcutaneously. Liraglutide increases insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner (i.e., only when plasma glucose levels are elevated), resulting in low-risk of hypoglycemia when used as monotherapy. When compared to insulin glargine therapy, the use of GLP-1 has resulted in comparable reduction in HbA1c level, lower rates of hypoglycemia and less weight gain. No prospective studies; however, have compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the hospital setting or after hospital discharge. The primary objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of liraglutide (Victoza®) versus glargine insulin in combination to oral anti-diabetic agents (OADs: metformin, sulfonylureas, nateglinide, repaglinide or pioglitazone) on glycemic control after 26 weeks of treatment in medicine patients with T2D after hospital discharge.
Specific Aim: To determine whether treatment with liraglutide (Victoza®) will result in similar glycemic control (HbA1c at 26 weeks) and a lower rate of hypoglycemic events compared to treatment with glargine (Lantus®) in patients with T2D after hospital discharge. Patients with poorly controlled (HbA1c \>7%-10%) T2D treated with diet or oral antidiabetic agents or low dose insulin naïve (0.4u/kg/day) prior to admission will be randomized to liraglutide or glargine in combination to OADs at hospital discharge.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
273
Liraglutide subcutaneously daily
Glargine once daily subcutaneously
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory Universtiy Hospital at MIdtown
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
State University of NY at Buffalo
New York, New York, United States
Glycemic Control at Hospital Discharge and 6 Months Follow up
To determine differences in HbA1c concentration at 26 weeks from discharge between liraglutide and glargine insulin therapy
Time frame: Hospital discharge, 6 months (26 weeks)
Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose (BG) Concentration After Follow up of 26 Weeks
To determine differences in BG concentration between liraglutide and glargine insulin therapy
Time frame: After discharge, average at 3 months (12 week) and 6 months (26 weeks)
Hypoglycemic Episodes
Number of participants who had at least one hypoglycemic event (\<70 mg/dl) and severe hypoglycemic event (\<40 mg/dl)
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
HbA1c <7.0% and no Hypoglycemia
Percent of patients with 26 week HbA1c \<7.0% and no hypoglycemia
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
HbA1c <7.0% and no Weight Gain
Percent of patients with 26 week HbA1c \<7.0% and no weight gain
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
HbA1c <7.0% and no Hypoglycemia
Percent of patients with 12 week HbA1c \<7.0% and no hypoglycemia
Time frame: After discharge, average 12 weeks
Change in Body Weight From Baseline
Change in body weight from baseline after 6 months of follow up (26 weeks)
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
Change in BMI
Change in BMI after 6 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up after discharge (average 6 months)
Total Daily Dose of Insulin
Evaluate the total daily dose of insulin needed in the group receiving glargine
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Blood Pressure
Cardiovascular risk factors including changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 26 weeks post-intervention
Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks post-intervention
Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Heart Rate
Cardiovascular risk: heart rate at baseline and 26 weeks post-intervention
Time frame: 26 weeks post-intervention
Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Lipid Profile
Lipid profile was measured with total cholesterol level results at 26 weeks post-intervention. This outcome was not part of standard of care.
Time frame: 26 weeks post-intervention
Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions
Number of participants who had at least one emergency room visit and hospital readmissions
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
Acute Renal Failure
Acute renal failure during the 26-week follow-up defined as a clinical diagnosis of acute renal failure with documented new-onset abnormal renal function (increment in creatinine \> 0.5 mg/dL from baseline)
Time frame: After discharge, average 6 months
Self-measured Blood Glucose (SMBG) 7-point Profiles at 26 Weeks Follow up
Number of participants that reported self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) 7-point profiles at 26 weeks follow up
Time frame: 26 weeks post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.