Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Overview

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of LCZ696 compared to valsartan in the reduction of cardiovascular death and heart failure(HF) hospitalizations in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active-controlled, study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan, on morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients (NYHA Class II-IV) with preserved ejection fraction. Specifically, the study evaluated the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to the active comparator valsartan in the reduction of the rate of CV death and total HF hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF. The trial consisted of two periods: (1) a single-blind treatment run-in epoch that lasted from 3 to 8 weeks, in which patients received valsartan 80 mg bid, followed by sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg bid and (2) a double-blind randomized treatment epoch (sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or valsartan 160 mg bid). In this study, investigators were responsible for assessing and submitting all events which could potentially fulfill the criteria for the primary, secondary, or other clinical endpoints to a Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC). Investigator reported events were assessed by the CEC for adjudication. For angioedema or angioedema-like events, investigators completed an Adjudication Questionnaire for an Angioedema-like Event form. All angioedema reports were forwarded to an Angioedema Adjudication Committee (AAC) by Novartis for assessment.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (715)

Outcomes