The purpose of this study is to assess whether Optiflow, a high-flow humidified oxygen delivery system, is superior to standard oxygen therapy during breaks off noninvasive ventilation in patients affected by acute respiratory failure and in respiratory distress. The investigators anticipate that the Optiflow will provide oxygen more effectively, be more comfortable and permit longer breaks off NIV, shortening the total duration of NIV.
Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) provides respiratory support to many patients affected by acute respiratory failure. This treatment, compared to invasive mechanical ventilation, allows patients to take intermittent breaks during which oxygen therapy is provided through a nasal cannula or mask. During these breaks, the lack of ventilator support may predispose to respiratory distress, retention of CO2 and oxygen desaturation. Optiflow is a nasal humidified (37◦C, 44mg/L H2O) high-flow (up to 60 L/min) therapy which can provide greater support than standard oxygen therapy during the breaks from NIV. Aim of the study is to evaluate Optiflow as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy during breaks from NIV in patients with acute respiratory failure. The investigators hypothesize tha Optiflow will reduce the total length of stay on NIV, and increase the comfort and length of the breaks. Also, the investigators anticipate that it will reduce respiratory rate, accessory muscle use and dyspnea score compared to standard oxygen therapy. Experimental design Prospective open-label, parallel, randomized (1:1) controlled study, with a target enrollment of 70. Study procedures Enrolled patients receiving NIV will be randomized into two arms; a treatment group which will receive Optiflow during breaks and a control arm which will receive standard oxygen therapy during breaks. In both cases, FiO2 will be titrated to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The necessity of breaks will be determined together with the patients (talk, eat, medication, communicate with family, inability to tolerate the interface), and the need to resume NIV will be based on clinical data, such as dyspnea, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) and patients' desire. Recorded data: The investigators will record demographic baseline data; Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory and heart rate, blood pressure, dyspnea score, accessory muscle use, and comfort score at randomization, at the end of each NIV session and NIV break; the length of each NIV session and break; the medications administered and all the arterial blood gases (ABG) on a daily basis. Moreover the investigators will record the NIV parameters and inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) at each session and break. Risks: The investigators don't anticipate any significant risks related to the study procedures and equipment. Some patients may not tolerate the Optiflow and some patients may fail NIV and require intubation.
During breaks from NIV oxygen will be provided through the Optiflow with FiO2 and flow-rate titrated to maintain the oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90%.
During breaks from NIV oxygen will be provided by standard nasal cannula or mask to maintain the SpO2 above 90%.
Intensive Care Unit and Intermediate Care Unit, Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Intensive Care Unit, Winchester Hospital
Winchester, Massachusetts, United States
Length of Stay on Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV)
The investigator will measure the total time on NIV in day(s), hours and minutes. This is done by having nursing staff note times of NIV start to finish of each session of NIV. They were added to get cumulative time.
Time frame: Day 1-7
Length of Breaks From NIV
This is done by having nursing staff note times of break start (off NIV) to start of next session of NIV in minutes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between hypercapnic and hypoxemic patients, not observed in terms of time spent on or off NIV.
Time frame: Day 4-10
Assessment of Respiratory Rate During Break
Evaluation of respiratory rate. This was counted for a minute at bedside at start and finish of break.
Time frame: day 1-4
Patients' Comfort
Using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients rate how comfortable they felt on a 1 to 10 scale with 10 being most comfortable and 1 being the least comfortable.
Time frame: Day 2-4
Oxygen Saturation During Breaks
Using pulse oximetry (SpO2) at beginning and end of breaks
Time frame: day 1-4
Need for Intubation
Count of participants who underwent endotracheal intubation
Time frame: Days 2-10
Ease of Eating
difficulty eating using patient rating on a visual analog scale of 0 for easy eating and 4 for difficult eating. Results tabulated as number of patients finding it easy to eat (Score of 0-1)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
47
Time frame: Day 1-4