The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective for treating patients with psoriatic arthritis.
This is a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis. Approximately 214 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) or identically-appearing placebo, with approximately 107 subjects per treatment group. This is a 113-week study. The subjects will spend 24 weeks in the double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by 28 weeks of active treatment phase (ie, up to Week 52 visit). The original treatment assignments (apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) or placebo) will remain blinded until all subjects have completed their Week 52 visit (or have discontinued). After the Week 52 visit, all subjects in the extension phase will continue to receive treatment with apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) until the end of the study (ie, up to Week 104 visit) or until early discontinuation from the trial. The study will consist of 5 phases: 1. Screening Phase - up to 5 weeks 2. Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double Blind Treatment Phase - Weeks 0 to 24 3. Active Treatment Phase - Week 24 to Week 52 4. Open-label Extension Phase - Week 52 to Week 104 5. Post-treatment Observational Follow-up Phase
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
219
30mg of Apremilast will be orally administered twice daily for 104 weeks
Identically appearing Placebo tablets will be orally administered twice daily for up to 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale \[NRS\]); * Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Those who withdrew early or who did not have sufficient data at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale \[NRS\]); * Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Those who withdrew early or who did not have sufficient data at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Achieve Clinical Research LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Desert Medical Advances
Palm Desert, California, United States
Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis
Brandon, Florida, United States
Health Point Medical Group
Brandon, Florida, United States
Palmetto Medical Research
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Jeffrey Alper MD Research
Naples, Florida, United States
Suncoast Clinical Research
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Coeur D'Alene Arthritis Clinic
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Rockford Orthopedic Associates, LLC
Rockford, Illinois, United States
...and 61 more locations
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score Using C-reactive Protein as the Acute-Phase Reactant (DAS28 [CRP]) at Week 24
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint count * 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; * C-reactive protein (CRP) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A higher value indicates higher disease activity, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) V2 Physical Function Domain Score at Week 24
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the 36-item SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24
The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary (PCS) score includes the physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the scale scores, as well as the PCS and MCS, is defined as a 2.5-point improvement (increase) from baseline. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores reflecting more disability, and higher scores reflecting less disability and better health. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 24
Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A higher value indicates longer duration, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Improved Change in Severity of Morning Stiffness at Week 24
Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. The response of no improvement includes subjects who had no change or worsened. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16
HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score DAS28 (CRP) at Week 16
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint count * 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; * C-reactive protein (CRP) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) V 2 Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 16
Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A higher value indicates longer duration, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Whose Severity of Morning Stiffness at Week 16 Improved From Baseline
Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment. Full Analysis Set; Participants who discontinued early prior to Week 16 and those who did not have sufficient data for a definitive determination of response status at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale \[NRS\]); * Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Weeks 52 and 104
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale \[NRS\]); * Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 52 and 104
HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52 and 104
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint count * 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; * C-reactive protein (CRP) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in 36-item SF-36 (V2.0) Physical Functioning Domain Score at Weeks 52 and 104
The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 52 and 104
Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A higher value indicates longer duration, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants Whose Severity of Morning Stiffness at Week 52 and 104 Improved From Baseline
Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the 24 Week Placebo Controlled Phase
A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Date of first dose of study drug to Week 24; median duration of exposure during placebo controlled phase was 24.14 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-Exposure Period
A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Start of lst dose of IP up to week 104: Weeks 0 to104 for those initially randomized to APR 30 mg BID, Weeks 16 -104 for PBO-treated patients who EE to APR at Week 16 and from Weeks 24-104 for PBO-treated patients who transitioned to APR at Week 24