Drug Eluting Balloon for Prevention of Hemodialysis Access Restenosis

N/ACompletedNCT01928498

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)120 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter to prevent restenosis after PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) of hemodialysis access (HA) in comparison with the uncoated PTA balloon catheter.

In Canada, there are over 20,000 patients with chronic end-stage renal disease (ESRD)on long-term hemodialysis and the number is increasing rapidly.The creation of hemodialysis access (HA) (also called "lifeline" for dialysis patients) has become the most common type of vascular surgery. These HA are frequently complicated by dysfunction after their creation mainly due to neointimal hyperplastic stenosis (\> 60% at one year). PTA is an established cornerstone method of treating stenotic lesions because of its minimally invasive percutaneous nature and widespread availability.Although PTA has a high initial success rate,narrowing will often recur in 2-3 months hence requiring further interventions. There are currently no durable therapies for the prevention or treatment of HA dysfunction restenosis after PTA. Recently drug eluting balloon (DEB) with paclitaxel have repeatedly demonstrated their effectiveness to prevent restenosis due to intimal proliferation in the coronary and peripheral arterial systems. The investigators believe that the DEB with paclitaxel will significantly decrease the HA restenosis rate at the treated site and therefore will improve the management of HA failures.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

120

Conditions

Arteriovenous Fistulae Arteriovenous Graft

Interventions

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon AngioplastyDEVICE

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)DEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical or hemodynamic evidence of HA dysfunction according to the clinician's judgment * Patients with AVF (arteriovenous fistulae)or AVG (arteriovenous graft) located in the forearm or upper arm and is \> 3 months old * Minimum age of 18 years and written informed consent * Target lesion stenosis is \<3.0 cm in length and \>50% in luminal diameter reduction * Maximum of two secondary lesions (stenoses) if the following criteria are satisfied: The secondary lesion is located in the graft or peripheral veins, the secondary lesion is \<3.0 cm in length and located \>1.0 cm away from the target lesion, the secondary lesion is \>50% luminal reduction compared to the reference vessel diameter * Reference vessel diameter between 4 to 7 mm * The HA must not be thrombosed and the lesion can be crossed with guide wire before angioplasty * Lesion site: from 2 cm above the arterial anastomosis to the superior vena cava * Restenotic lesion (previously treated by PTA or stent) or de novo lesion Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication to angiography or PTA * Intervention of the HA circuit within the past 30 days * Systemic infection or a local infection associated with the graft * The patient is pregnant * Patient is enrolled in another investigational study. * Life expectancy \< 12 months * History of severe allergic reaction to contrast media or to paclitaxel

Locations (3)

Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne

Longueuil, Quebec, Canada

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Centre Hospitalier de l'université de Montréal-CHUM

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months after PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty)

Comparison of the mean LLL (late lumen loss) in patients in the two trial arms (DEB vs plain PTA) evaluated by quantitative angiography at six months after PTA. LLL is defined as the difference between the MLD (minimum lumen diameter) immediately after balloon angioplasty and the MLD at follow-up

Time frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

The angiographic percentage of diameter stenosis and the incidence of angiographic binary restenosis rate (≥50% of the diameter of the reference-vessel segment)

The change in the degree of stenosis (in %) at the intervention site between the measure right after the intervention, and 6 months later and the difference between restenosis rates in the two trial arms at 6 months.

Time frame: 6 months

Change of HA flow

Difference between mean HA flow in the two groups (measured at the same times)

Time frame: Before angioplasty, week 1, month 1or month 3

The rate of HA failure

Time elapsed from the initial intervention (at randomization) to the earliest (if any) of these 3 events: HA thrombosis, HA re-intervention (surgical or endovascular, including creation of a new HA), or CVC (central venous catheter) insertion for dialysis purpose

Time frame: 3 months

Drug eluting balloon safety

Proportion of patients with side effects in the 2 groups.

Time frame: 3 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.