1. To evaluate the short and longer-term efficacy of a structured outpatient intervention program (The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention, RAI) to improve survivors' resilience. 2. To evaluate the impact of treatment on emotional well-being and postinjury adjustment. 3. To evaluate the impact of the intervention on abilities including problem solving, communication, and stress management. 4. To examine the extent to which treatment benefits are sustained in the longer-term.
To design effective resilience interventions, a treatment modality which is effective for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors is needed. Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) researchers have had considerable success in the past several decades developing and evaluating interventions for neurobehavioral, cognitive, and vocational challenges after TBI. Researchers have demonstrated the utility of the curriculum-based (C-B) treatment structure in various settings. Additionally, the efficacy of the C-B structure, independent of postinjury timeframe, allows the flexibility necessary to address the unique consequences of TBI. The C-B treatment modality offers a promising strategy for the promotion of resilience postinjury. The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a structured, curriculum-based intervention to promote postinjury resilience and adjustment. Objectives include: 1. to evaluate the short and longer-term efficacy of a structured outpatient intervention program (The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention, RAI) to improve survivors' resilience 2. to evaluate the impact of treatment on emotional well-being and postinjury adjustment 3. to evaluate the impact of the intervention on abilities including problem solving, communication, and stress management 4. to examine the extent to which treatment benefits are sustained in the longer-term
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
164
Intervention to promote individual's resilience and adjustment (RAI) - The RAI is a structured approach to helping individuals after brain injury address issues related to resilience and adjustment. The RAI is implemented in seven sessions. Each session is in-person and lasts for 60 minutes.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC-10)
During the past decade, researchers have developed resilience measurement scales, and a recent review suggested that Connor and Davidson have been most successful. The authors first developed a 25 item scale (CD-RISC) reflecting resilience characteristics identified by Kobasa and Rutter. Normative studies including factor analyses indicated that the CD-RISC is reliable, valid, and sensitive to treatment effects. More recently, a 10-item version was developed using exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses. Respondents are presented with a series of descriptors (e.g., "I am able to adapt and change," "Coping with stress can strengthen me") and rate themselves on a 0 - 4 scale ranging from rarely true (0) to true nearly all the time (4). Campbell-Sills and colleagues have characterized the 10-item version, to be used in the present study, as demonstrating excellent psychometric properties, namely reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)
Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4)
The MPAI-4 is comprised of 30 items rated from 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating greater problem severity. Items are subdivided into three subscales reflecting emotional and behavioral self-regulation (Adjustment Index), cognitive and physical abilities (Ability Index), and community integration (Participation Index). T-scores are obtained based on norms derived from a brain injury sample. The present investigation will focus on the former two subscales. Adjustment Index items relate to anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, social interaction, and self-awareness. The Ability Index includes items relating to verbal and nonverbal communication and problem solving ability. Research has provided evidence of good concurrent, construct, and predictive validity as well as satisfactory internal consistency. Sensitivity to treatment-related change has also been substantiated.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.