A large group of non-small cell lung cancer patients is treated with radiotherapy. Delivery of very high radiation doses is needed to obtain local control, but due to the large tumor and nodal volume this is often impossible without causing unrepairable damage to the normal tissue of the mediastinum, spinal cord, esophagus and lung. Although every tumor is different with respect to the speed with which it grows and spreads, it is obvious that time plays an important role in cancer therapy. Recently it was reported that disease progression or increase of tumor volume occurred during the time interval between diagnosis and treatment.(1, 2) This could lead to a less optimal radiation treatment and consequently have an impact on overall survival. Moreover, the increasing number of diagnostic procedures, aimed at obtaining more accurate information about the tumor extension and biology, as well as the use of more sophisticated but labor intense radiation techniques could prolong the time interval between clinical symptoms and the start of the treatment. However, the influence of new diagnostic procedures or the applied radiotherapy techniques on waiting times is not yet known. The investigators therefore want to investigate 1) time trends in the waiting time for NSCLC patients, 2) the correlation between waiting times and the use of more advanced diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and 3) the correlation between waiting times and overall survival. The hypotheses of the study: 1. The diagnostic delay for NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years. 2. The preparation time for radiotherapy of NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years. 3. Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse overall survival outcome.
A large group of non-small cell lung cancer patients is treated with radiotherapy. Delivery of very high radiation doses is needed to obtain local control, but due to the large tumor and nodal volume this is often impossible without causing unrepairable damage to the normal tissue of the mediastinum, spinal cord, esophagus and lung. Although every tumor is different with respect to the speed with which it grows and spreads, it is obvious that time plays an important role in cancer therapy. Recently it was reported that disease progression or increase of tumor volume occurred during the time interval between diagnosis and treatment.(1, 2) This could lead to a less optimal radiation treatment and consequently have an impact on overall survival. Moreover, the increasing number of diagnostic procedures, aimed at obtaining more accurate information about the tumor extension and biology, as well as the use of more sophisticated but labor intense radiation techniques could prolong the time interval between clinical symptoms and the start of the treatment. However, the influence of new diagnostic procedures or the applied radiotherapy techniques on waiting times is not yet known. The investigators therefore want to investigate 1) time trends in the waiting time for NSCLC patients, 2) the correlation between waiting times and the use of more advanced diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and 3) the correlation between waiting times and overall survival. The hypotheses of the study: 1. The diagnostic delay for NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years. 2. The preparation time for radiotherapy of NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years. 3. Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse overall survival outcome. The IKL collected data on waiting times and treatment of NSCLC patients treated in 2001 and 2004. These data will be used for this project. In addition, the MAASTRO lung database contains information of patients treated in 2006 and 2010. Additional information about the diagnostic procedure and radiation treatment preparation will be collected by reviewing the patient charts. For this study a data request has to be submitted to the IKL and access to MAASTRO patient data (charts and EMD) is needed. The investigators aim to collect the following variables: Date of consultation pulmonologist; Date of multidisciplinary meeting; Date of first consultancy at radiotherapy; Date of start radiotherapy; Information about diagnostic procedure (PET/CT/Pathology/EBUS/EUS); Information about RT procedure (3Dconventional/IMRT); General patient characteristics; Overall survival
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
MAASTRO clinic
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Analysis of waiting times
Retrospective analysis of the time passed between consultation and start of radiotherapy (an expected average time frame of two weeks).
Time frame: From intake to start of radiotherapy
Correlation of waiting times and treatment outcome
Is there a correlation between the time passed between consultation and start of radiotherapy and treatment outcome? (Time frame: 12 years)
Time frame: From treatment until date of censoring (12 years)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.