The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of the utilization of two doses of corticotrophin ( ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as well as the structural findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Corticotrophin (ACTH) may prevent the well documented structural progression damage in RA patients using disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy alone.
This is a Phase II 24-week open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of H.P. Acthar Gel Respository Injection, Corticotrophin( ACTH) administered to newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis in conjunction with methotrexate, folllowed by a 24 week follow-up period. There will be a total of twenty (20) patients and two (2) treatment groups with 10 patients in each treatment group
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Comparison of different dosages of the drug. Ten patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin weekly. Ten patients will receive 80 units bi-weekly of corticotrophin
AARDS Research, Inc
Aventura, Florida, United States
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6
Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements
To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist
Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0).
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings
Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0). CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Month 6