This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab given as intravitreal injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
This was a 12-month, phase IIIb, randomized, Visual Acuity assessor-masked, multi-center, interventional study assessing the efficacy and safety of the TER vs monthly regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal (IVT) injections in patients with newly diagnosed nAMD. Patients will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms, Treat and Extend or monthly regimens. There will be 3 periods in this study: Screening period (up to 14days), treatment period (11 months), follow-up period (1 month). At randomization visit patients will be randomized into one of the 2 treatment groups Group I ranibizumab 0.5 mg based on monthly treatment or Group II ranibizumab 0.5 mg based on TER (randomization ratio of 1:1) and will receive the first dose of Investigational treatment. Patients in Group I the following visits will perform on monthly intervals. For patients in Group II the investigator will evaluate disease activity (i.e., signs of exudation) based on SD-OCT, and in case of absence of disease activity every next visit will be 2 weeks), with a maximum of a 12-week interval.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
650
0.5 mg ranibizumab (intravitreal injections) prefilled syringe)
0.5 mg ranibizumab (intravitreal injections) prefilled syringe)
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement
Time frame: Baseline to month 12
Number of Visits Scheduled
The number of visits scheduled according to the treat and extend regimen after treatment initiation
Time frame: From Month1 to Month 11
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Average BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from Baseline to Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months
Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and compare to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Antwerp, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottignies, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Zottegem, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, Croatia, Croatia
Novartis Investigative Site
Glostrup Municipality, Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Roskilde, Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Cairo, Abbassia, Egypt
Novartis Investigative Site
Cairo, Egypt
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, Germany, Germany
...and 81 more locations
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 12 as compared with baseline
Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months
Number of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by Visit
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months
Number of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 12 indicates a positive outcome
Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months
The Mean Number of Treatment Frequency
The number of injections received
Time frame: Month 12
The Average Number of Days Between Injections
The average dosing interval was measured as the average number of days between injections
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12
OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess intra-retinal fluid as Measured by SD-OCT (Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography). Fluid free macula refers to absence of macular edema (as assessed by the reading center). The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the macular edema (center involvement) at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages
Time frame: Month 12
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over Time
OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center. The Ns in the rows is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye at
To evaluate presence of active CNV leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA) by reading center over time up to Month 12. The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the presence of leakage at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages.
Time frame: Month 12
Change From Baseline in Composite Score of the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)
The survey consisted of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. The score of each individual question ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 which indicates the best possible response. The composite score and score of each of each construct also ranged from 0 to 100 as they are calculated as total scores divided by the number of questions. The higher the values of total scores represent better outcome
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12