BACKGROUND: Alteplase dissolves blood vessel clots in acute ischemic stroke and is the only approved acute drug treatment \<4½ hours of stroke onset. The overall benefit from alteplase is substantial, but up to 2/3 of patients with large artery clots may not achieve reopening of the vessel and up to 40% of the patients may remain severely disabled or die, leaving substantial room for improvement. Tenecteplase, widely used in coronary heart disease, may be more effective and may have less bleeding complications than alteplase, and may be the drug of choice also in stroke. HYPOTHESIS: Tenecteplase may be given safely to patients with acute ischemic stroke at a dose that is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with existing treatment options. AIMS: To compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase vs. alteplase given \<4½ hours after symptom onset. STUDY ENDPOINTS: The primary study endpoint is excellent clinical outcome at 3 months (effect). Secondary study endpoints are major early clinical improvement (effect) and bleeding complications (safety).
HYPOTHESIS: 1) Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg may be given safely to patients with acute ischaemic stroke \<4½ hours after stroke onset. 2) Tenecteplase 0,4 mg/kg (single bolus)has superior efficacy and safety compared with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes) when given within 4 ½ hours after stroke onset. DESIGN: NOR-TEST is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial with randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase 1:1. POWER CALCULATION: NOR-TEST aims at detecting a 9 % higher percentage excellent outcome with tenecteplase vs. alteplase (r1=0.40; r2=0.49; OR 1.44; power 0.8), and will include 954 patients during 3 years. PATIENT RECRUITMENT: All patients found eligible for thrombolytic therapy are eligible for NOR-TEST, i.e. NOR-TEST changes neither inclusion nor exclusion criteria. The number of patients treated at a participating centre will therefore essentially remain unchanged. Estimated 400 patients are thrombolysed per year in participating centres. Allowing for 20% of patients not being included in NOR-TEST, the total number of patients (n=954) will still be met.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,050
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Nordland Hospital
Bodø, Norway
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, Norway
Førde Central Hospital
Førde, Norway
Haugesund Hospital
Haugesund, Norway
Molde Hospital
Molde, Norway
Akershus University Hospital
Nordbyhagen, Norway
Ullevål University Hospital
Oslo, Norway
Baerum Hospital
Rud, Norway
Telemark Hospital
Skien, Norway
...and 3 more locations
Clinical: Functional handicap
Excellent outcome defined as mRS 0-1
Time frame: 90 days
Symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage
Haemorrhagic transformation (haemorrhagic infarct / haematoma) as defined by CT (or MRI)
Time frame: 24-36 hours
Hemorrhagic transformation
Any hemorrhagic infarct or parenchymal hematoma
Time frame: 24-36 hours
Neurological improvement
NIHSS changes from baseline: NIHSS=0 or reduction of ≥4 NIHSS points
Time frame: 24 hours
Clinical: Functional handicap
Ordinal shift analysis of mRS
Time frame: 90 days
Safety
Death
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.