Effects of Early Intervention for Preterm Children at School Age

Overview

Despite the remarkable achievements in neonatal survival of preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight \< 1,500 g) over the past three decades, improvements have produced little change in their prevalence of severe developmental disability and the rate of low severity dysfunctions (e.g., learning disabilities, low IQ, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific neuropsychological deficits, poor perceptual-motor skills and internalizing behavioral problems) remains high as 50% to 70%. Few intervention programs developed for preterm infants in Western societies were shown to have short- to long-term benefits in certain cognitive functions, however, rare studies have investigated intervention effect at school age and explored plausible neurological pathway for effective intervention. This three-year study was therefore aimed to extend our previous research to longitudinally examine the effectiveness of three intervention programs (clinic-based intervention program \[CBIP\], home-based intervention program \[HBIP\] and usual care program \[UCP\]) for VLBW preterm children in Taiwan at seven years of age.(The intervention had been delivered from birth to one year of corrected age in the previous study. The intervention will not be given in this study.)The CBIP and HBIP contained similar child- and parent-focused services as well as interaction activities but were respectively delivered at the clinic for the CBIP and at home for the HBIP. A total of 178 VLBW preterm infants had been randomly assigned to the CBIP, HBIP or UCP. Sixty-two gender and maternal education level matched term children with normal birth weight had also been included to serve as the reference group for comparison of developmental outcomes. Effectiveness examined included child and parent outcomes. The long-term effect of the early intervention for preterm children would provide important information to help medical professionals and public policy makers to develop an effective intervention for Taiwanese preterm children who are at risk of developmental disorders.

Specific Aims: This study was to extend our previous research to longitudinally examine the effectiveness of three intervention programs (CBIP, HBIP and UCP) for VLBW preterm children in Taiwan at seven years of age. Gender and maternal education level matched term children were also included to serve as the reference group for comparison of developmental outcomes. The intervention had been delivered from birth to one year of corrected age in the previous study. Effectiveness examined including children's and parental outcomes. Primary outcome referred to measures of child neurobehavioral functions. Neurobehavioral assessment included cognitive, motor and behavioral measurement. Secondary outcomes referred to child growth and health, neurophysiological functions, and the quality of parenting measures. Neurophysiological assessment referred to electroencephalogram/event-related potential examinations that were used to investigate the neurological pathways underlying the effective intervention. Subjects and Methods: Participants: One hundred and seventy-eight VLBW preterm children and 62 term children who had participated in our previous study were enrolled in this study. VLBW preterm children were born or admitted at the National Taiwan University Hospital, the Mackay Memorial Hospital and Taipei City Hospital, Branch for Women and Children in Taipei, Taiwan, during the time period of 2006 to 2008. Methods: While age seven is an important time period that children enter elementary school and begin to participate in school activities, more comprehensive outcome measurements are required. The World Health Organization emphasizes that health conditions should be considered from the body, individuals and societal perspectives as depicted in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Accordingly, the outcome measures in this study consisted of the primary (i.e., child neurobehavioral functions) and secondary outcomes (i.e., child growth and health, neurophysiological functions, and quality of parenting). Child neurobehavioral assessment included measurements of cognitive, motor, and behavior function. The domains of cognitive functions examined including the intelligence (IQ test), the efficiency of attention control (sustained attention test), and the cognitive flexibility and planning (executive function test). The motor function included motor skill acquisition and coordination. Children's behavior was measured using the parental report of child behavior and teacher's observation for child's adaptive behavior in the school context. Children's educational resources (special education or resource class) or other education-related support received from any institution would also be recorded in this study. Child neurophysiological functions were measured by the electroencephalogram (EEG)/event-related potential (ERP) technique. All families were contacted via phone call and mail to be enrolled in this study. Children and their parents would have been examined for the following outcomes when the children approached at seven years of age. All measures except for the neurophysiological measures were conducted at Infant Motor Development Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University. Several examiners with the background knowledge of physical therapy or psychology received training with the testing instruments and procedures. Before commencing the study assessments, the interrater reliability (agreement with an experienced investigator \> 0.80) would have been required for the assessors. All the examiners were kept blind to children's group assignment. To decrease the fatigue in children due to the prolonged examination, participants were asked to return twice for assessment.The first assessment would have taken 180 minutes which consisted of the IQ test, sustained attention test, and executive function test that the whole session.The second assessment was the neurophysiological measurement with the EEG/ERP tasks which would have taken 90 minutes.