The aim of this study is to investigate whether a 4-week physical fitness training (target intervention) in stroke patients (subacute stage) increase the walking speed and activities of daily living compared with a control intervention (relaxation exercises). The target or control intervention is performed in addition to standard rehabilitation treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
200
Beelitz Heilstätten
Beelitz-Heilstätten, Brandenburg, Germany
Median Klinik Grünheide
Grünheide, Brandenburg, Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, Germany
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI) (co-primary endpoint)
comparing gait speed (m/s) and points achieved in BARTHEL Index in aerobic and non-aroebic training group 3 months after stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: 3 months post stroke vs baseline
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI)
comparing gait speed (m/s) and points achieved in BI in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
motor function
comparing motor function (assessed via different clinical scales e.g. Rivermead Arm test, REPAS, Box and Block Test, Medical Research Council Scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mobility
comparing different mobilitiy indices like gait endurance (in min), stride length, step cadence, use of walking aids, actigraph measurements and the Rivermead mobility Index in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
cognitive function
comparing cognitive function (assessed via points achieved in different scales, e.g. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making test, word fluency) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
Berlin, Germany
Evanglisches Geriatriezentrum Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Medical Park Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Disability
comparing disability (Modified rankin scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Quality of life (QoL)
comparing QoL (EQ-5D-5L scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
sleep
comparing sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mood
comparing mood (CES-D scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Physical fitness
comparing gait energy Expenditure in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke, all vs baseline
Assessment of safety
comparing different criteria (recurrent fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, refferal to acute hospital, death) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Maximal walking speed and Barthel-Index
per Protocol analysis of co-primary endpoint (pre-specified in statistical analysis plan and protocol)
Time frame: 3 months post stroke vs. baseline