Congestive heart failure is a common disorder in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the needs of the rest of the body. Poor sodium handling by the kidneys is a damaging effect of heart failure, and it leads to symptoms of congestion such as shortness of breath or ankle swelling. Recent studies suggest that reducing the nerve activity to a kidney could reduce sodium retention and blood pressure. An improvement in the way the kidneys handle sodium may reduce disease progression and decrease symptoms for heart failure patients.
Over the past decades, clinical trials in HF have been unable to alter the natural history of cardio-renal compromise. Fluid retention accounts for the majority of admissions for acute decompensated heart failure, and salt and water removal using intravenous (IV) diuretics has been the mainstay of therapy applied to this population.1 Over 20% of hospitalized patients in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) had serum creatinine values greater than 2.0 mg/dL2 with the majority of congested patients presenting with significantly elevated systolic blood pressures rather than low-output states.1 Administration of IV loop diuretics further produces intravascular volume depletion and reduction in glomerular filtration rates3 as well as an increase in neurohormonal activation.4 This is true regardless of whether LVEF is impaired or preserved.5 However, despite relieving symptoms, acute drug administrations (such as adenosine receptor antagonists or natriuretic peptide analogues) for short durations have not changed the long-term cardio-renal outcomes in large clinical trials. Recent recognition of different phenotypes of cardio-renal syndrome has provided better characterization of patient populations to evaluate specific treatment approaches or interventions.6 There is now greater appreciation that patients with congestive HF depend not only on an adequate glomerular function for renal glomerular filtration, but also on adequate tubular function for effective sodium handling that may or may not be dependent on glomerular filtration.7 Despite optimizing intracardiac filling pressures, many patients with August 28, 2013 Page 10 of 58 cardio-renal compromise remain symptomatic, complaining of breathlessness and fatigue often associated with concomitant increase in neurohormonal up-regulation (e.g. natriuretic peptides) and poor outcomes.8 Since the majority of patients present with hypertension, it points to the possibility that congestive HF is precipitated by heightened sympathetic drive. Animal models have demonstrated that both blood pressure control and renal tubular function/glomerular filtration (as a function of renal blood flow) can be directly influenced by renal sympathetic nerve activity,9-12 which has evolved to provide cardiovascular support in the setting of hypovolemia or profound cardiovascular collapse. Specifically, HF animal models with denervated kidneys have demonstrated improvement in renal blood flow and natriuresis (with restoration of Na+-K+ ATPase at the loop of Henle, as well as epithelial sodium pumps at the distal tubules). However, our understanding of how persistently activated renal sympathetic outflow can lead to exaggerated neurohormonal up-regulation and chemoreceptor regulation in humans is still evolving. As heightened cardio-renal compromise leads to disease progression and congestive HF, it is conceivable that an approach to selectively modulate renal sympathetic outflow may improve cardio-renal compromise as well as the target mechanism leading to symptomatic improvement in at-risk patients. By establishing the mechanistic role of renal sympathetic outflow in patients with impaired sodium handling as a contributor to congestion in HF, we may better understand why patients with HF develop symptoms, retain salt and water, and activate neurohormonal systems. This trial will be hypothesis generating and will serve to inform a larger clinical trial in patients with congestion related to HF. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB), an independent committee assigned by the sponsor to oversee the conduct and safety of this study, met on May 12, 2014 to review information that had become available from another study of the renal artery denervation procedure using the same investigational catheter as the PRESERVE study. Even though there were no concerns for the safety of subjects that had the renal artery denervation, the DSMB decided to stop the PRESERVE study. Based upon agreement with the FDA, the protocol was amended to reduce subject participation from 52 weeks to 13 weeks and to only collect limited safety information.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Renal denervation
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Urine Sodium Excretion
Within-subject comparison of increase in urine sodium excretion following saline loading before RSD and 13 weeks following RSD.
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Urine Volume
Urine volume following furosemide therapy after sodium loading.
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
24-hour Urine Sodium Excretion
Difference in 24-hour urine sodium excretion, compared between pre-RSD and 13 weeks after RSD.
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by creatinine and cystatin C
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Serum Cystatin C
Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Level
Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Creatinine Clearance From 24-hour Urine Creatinine
Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Urine Albumin
Urine albumin
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Metro Health System
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 2 more locations
Renal Resistive Index
Intra-renal hemodynamics as measured by Renal Resistive Index (RRI) by renal Doppler ultrasonography Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume
Echo: Left ventricular end systolic volume Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Echo: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Global Longitudinal Strain
Echo: Global longitudinal strain Study terminated early, endpoints not measured
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
LV End Systolic Dimension (LVESd)
Echo: LV end systolic dimension (LVESd)
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
LV End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDd)
Echo: LV end diastolic dimension (LVEDd)
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Left Atrial Size
Echo: Left Atrial size
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Plasma N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Resting Plasma Norepinephrine
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Resting Urine Norepinephrine
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Plasma Renin Activity
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Plasma Aldosterone
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
6 Minute Walk Test
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Patient Global Assessment
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Heart Rate Variability
Heart rate variability indices by Holter
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Tissue Doppler Indices
Echo: Tissue Doppler indices
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume
Echo: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume
Time frame: 13 Weeks following Renal Denervation