The first purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the stellate ganglion block realized with two different approaches (blind and ultrasound-guided) in patients with a diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. The second purpose of this study is to determine the safest approach and to compare the safety profiles of the two approaches.
To evaluate whether the ultrasound guided approach is more effective than the blind technique in producing a greater than 1.5 degree Celsius rise in ipsilateral arm temperature after a stellate ganglion block. Blocks will both be performed with 10 mL of xylocaine/bupivacaine. Secondary outcomes will be the impact of the approach (blind vs ultrasound) on pain reduction, horner syndrome, side effects (hoarseness, dysphagia, pharyngeal discomfort) and complications (blood aspiration, intravascular injection).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
3
A mixture of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 7 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine is used for both approaches (blind and ultrasound-guided).
A mixture of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 7 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine is used for both approach (blind and ultrasound-guided).
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
proportion of patients reaching >1.5 °C rise in ipsilateral arm temperature
Time frame: thirty minutes after block
Complications
Seizure, loss of consciousness with apnea, hematoma, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, phrenic nerve paralysis, pneumothorax, weakness of the ipsilateral upper limb, foreign body sensation
Time frame: Time of the block to one week after the block
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.