Remembering how to travel from one location to another is critical in everyday life, yet this vital ability declines with normal aging and can be further affected by conditions that disproportionately affect the elderly, such as vision loss or progressive dementia. Human and animal research has shown that two distinct memory systems interact during navigation. The first, referred to as allocentric navigation, is very flexible and uses spatial knowledge of key features or landmarks to develop and use a mental map of the environment. This approach involves brain regions that are critical for new learning and memory but that decline with age. The second, referred to as egocentric navigation, is inflexible and relies on "habit" memories that link specific features with specific directions. This approach relies on brain regions that are critical for "automatic" responses and that are relatively unaffected by age. The main problem is that allocentric navigation declines with age and is accompanied increased dependence on egocentric navigation. This change increases the risk of becoming disoriented or "lost" when traveling in unfamiliar areas or even when traveling new routes in familiar areas. Therefore, the main goal of this project is to examine whether non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve allocentric navigation in healthy older adults and patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants will complete two functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions while learning new environments. Before one of these sessions, participants will receive active brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. Before the other session, participants will receive sham brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. The effects of this stimulation will be evaluated using both an allocentric and an egocentric memory test. Physiologic effects will be evaluated using both task-based and resting-state MRI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
44
Active and/or sham; All participants receive both stimulation condition. Groups will be counterbalanced (half receiving active tDCS in the first session and sham in the second session; the other half receiving the opposite).
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, United States
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Accuracy in Centimeters From Target Location for Allocentric
1 active tDCS; 1 sham tDCS for each measure. Participants touched a screen (using a ELO 19" touchscreen monitor) to document the location of the landmark. The distance between the actual vs. selected location served as the dependent measure.
Time frame: Outcome assessed after each of 2 sessions (estimated within 1 week of each other)
Hippocampal BOLD Signal During Task-based fMRI
BOLD signal change comparing active to sham tDCS during Allocentric navigation (i.e., active HD-tDCS \> sham HD-tDCS). Activation maps thresholded at p\<.01 with minimum cluster size of 5 voxels.
Time frame: change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month)
Dorsal Attention Network Connectivity During Resting-state fMRI
Change in resting state functional connectivity strength between active and sham tDCS sessions. Strength is measured by Pearson r correlations between nodes, which are z-transformed, and summated.
Time frame: change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month)
Egocentric
Number of turns correctly recalled for each egocentric environment
Time frame: Outcome assessed after each of the 2 sessions
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.