Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject. Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
The second generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has demonstrated good virological and immunological outcomes in antiretroviral-naive subjects, compared with efavirenz, (SPRING 1 study). As well, it is active against HIV strains resistant to first-generation inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients (VIKING study). Additionally, it was safe and well tolerated after two years of use. It is administered once daily with no need for boosting, no food requirements and has a long half-life. The easy posology and its pharmacokinetics, together with the antiviral potency, make this drug a good alternative as a simplification approach. However, no clinical data are available supporting the switch of protease inhibitors or no nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-treated subjects. Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject. Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours
Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir
GermansTrias i Pujol Hospital
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in femur T-score measured by DEXA
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-score measured by DEXA
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: Baseline
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 4
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 12
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 24
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 48
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: Baseline
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 4
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 12
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 24
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 48
Genotypic test if virological failure occurs.
Time frame: From baseline to week 48
Compare changes in total cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in HDL cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in LDL cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in triglyceride levels.
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in filtrate glomerular rate by MDRD equation
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in creatinine
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in albumine/creatinine ratio
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in proteinuria/creatinine ratio
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Adverse events related to antiretroviral treatment (Toxicity).
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Patient withdrawal
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in osteocalcin
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in alkaline phosphatase
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in telopeptide
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.