The placebo effect is a phenomenon that has experienced major advances of its understanding in the last decade. However, mechanisms of placebo analgesia in chronic pain patients have yet to be compared to healthy subjects. The investigators study aims to investigate the magnitude of placebo response and related opioid release in patients that suffer from episodic migraines as compared to healthy controls. In particular, the investigators are looking to map brain activity during placebo analgesia using modern brain imaging techniques such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The investigators hypothesis is that placebo response and the availability of opioid receptors is reduced in chronic migraine patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
23
Placebo will be compared to No Intervention.
Athinoula A. Martinos. Center for Biomedical Imaging
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-10 Pain Rating
This study will investigate how placebo may reduce experimental pain induced by contact heat. Patients rate heat stimulus intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is most intense pain possible. Data is reported to the placebo condition. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'most intense pain possible'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain Anticipation fMRI BOLD Signal
We imaged the subjects under an MRI scan. All data was collected on a Siemens 3 Tesla MR scanner using a PETcompatible eight-channel head coil. Structural T1 weighted MPRAGE Functional scans were preprocessed using slice timing correction, realignment, normalization, and smoothing (8 mm FWHM Gaussian filter), using SPM12. In each condition (placebo \& no drug) subjects underwent four sets of pain anticipation at high and low temperatures (somatosensory control condition). The stimuli were modeled as boxcar time series, with additional regressors for temperature ramp-up, ramp-down, pain rating sequence, and six motion regressors.data were collected for each of the two PET-MR scans. Contrasts analyzed included pain anticipation. The values for the 8 sets of anticipation, for both the migraine and the healthy group are combined
Time frame: 1 day
Pain Stimulation fMRI BOLD Signal
We imaged the subjects under an MRI scan. All data was collected on a Siemens 3 Tesla MR scanner using a PETcompatible eight-channel head coil. Structural T1 weighted MPRAGE Functional scans were preprocessed using slice timing correction, realignment, normalization, and smoothing (8 mm FWHM Gaussian filter), using SPM12. In each condition (placebo \& no drug) subjects underwent four sets of pain stimulation at high and low temperatures (somatosensory control condition). The stimuli were modeled as boxcar time series, with additional regressors for temperature ramp-up, ramp-down, pain rating sequence, and six motion regressors.data were collected for each of the two PET-MR scans. Contrasts analyzed included pain stimulation. The values for the 8 sets of stimulation, for both the migraine and the healthy group are combined
Time frame: 1 day
PET Diprenorphine
We sought to find if endogenous opioid levels and endogenous opioid release induced by placebo administration differentiates between the no intervention first, then placebo group compared to the placebo first, then no intervention group in migraine patients.
Time frame: 1 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.