SPECT is currently the dominant clinical test for diagnostic and prognostic purposes as well as therapeutic decision-making. Given the shortage of nuclear reactor-produced Tc, advancing the use of non-isotope based imaging modalities has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with CAD as each one of these technics (CMR, CT, Stress echocardiography) has its own distinct potential advantages over SPECT.
Obtain a better understanding of the clinical utility of advanced non-isotope-based imaging modalities to detect relevant CAD as potential alternatives to SPECT. Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled in total. Three groups of about 150 patients per group. Each group will undergo imaging with 2 modalities; Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR, Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT, Group 3:99mTcSPECT plus stress echocardiography. All 450 patients will undergo standard invasive coronary angiography following completion of non-invasive imaging, except for patients in whom both nuclear and non-nuclear imaging modalities reveal a normal result confirming the absence of significant coronary artery disease (i.e invasive angiography would not be clinically indicated and FFR would be considered to be above 0.8). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) flow will be measured in all patients undergoing angiography, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured in all patients except those with TIMI flow =0, 1 and 2. All imaging procedures must be completed within 6 weeks. All patients will have a follow-up visit at 6 months after enrollment. During the 6 month follow-up visit major adverse cardiovascular events will be collected and adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee (CEC).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
467
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Overall accuracy of "significant coronary artery disease (CAD)" according to non-invasive imaging modality
The overall accuracy is calculated as the probability that a subject is correctly classified (presence of significant CAD or not) by non-invasive imaging modality. The standard of truth is presence of significant CAD or not according to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Time frame: baseline
Sensitivity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
The sensitivity is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
Time frame: baseline
Specificity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
The specificity is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
Time frame: baseline
Positive predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
The positive predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly have significant CAD according to FFR
Time frame: baseline
Negative predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
The negative predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly does not have significant CAD according to FFR
Time frame: Baseline
Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline
Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Time frame: Baseline