This clinical investigation addresses the performance of a re-designed The current study aims to investigate the next version of the TW speaking valve, in combination with both a 15mm and 22mm HME cassette.
This clinical investigation addresses the performance of a re-designed (updated) speaking valve with Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HME) for tracheotomized patients (project development name 'TW', commercial name 'DualCare'). Study participants trial the new device for 2 weeks after which they can choose to discontinue using the device or continue in the 3 month follow-up part of the study. Clinical feasibility is assessed using structured questionnaires addressing voice and speech, quality of life, breathing, swallowing, olfaction, sleeping, and respiratory symptoms. This is an exploratory, observational study and no specific hypotheses have been formulated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
16
The TW speaking valve with HME will be used during the day, whereas during sleep patients will use an HME without an automatic speaking valve. Data from TW15 and TW22 will be combined.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Evaluate Patient Experiences Associated With Exposure to the Speaking Valve With a Heat- and Moisture Exchanger (TW) for Tracheotomized Patients Based on Results From Questionnaires.
Patients were asked to use either the old TW15 and the TW22 HME device for a week, data combined for the two devices (the device used was recorded). After each week, patients completed a device specific questionnaire (Borg Scale). After the re-design (ie Updated speaking valve), patients were asked to use the new Speaking Valve for a week and then to complete relevant sections of the same questionnaire. Both at baseline and in the follow-up, patients were asked about their breathing using a Borg scale at a particular moment. This scale has a range from 0-6 where a score close to "0" indicates less breathing problems.
Time frame: 3 weeks including Baseline, week 1, 2 (old device) and week 3 (updated device).
Hours of HME Use Per Day.
The mean number of hours of TW use per 24 hours was calculated.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)
Device Preference Rating.
Patients were asked to rate the devices on a scale from 0-10, where "10" indicates the best score and "0" the worst score. The overall mean satisfaction with the speaking valve was rated.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2 (Old device, data averaged) and Week 3 (Updated device)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.